Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The IRS’s God Complex: IRS signs secret pact with atheists, promising to investigate 99 churches.
National Review ^ | 08/04/2014 | Quin Hillyer

Posted on 08/04/2014 7:01:11 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Is the Internal Revenue Service a threat to religious liberty?

As the IRS continues to come under well-aimed fire for harassing conservative groups, on Friday it secured a final court order formalizing what amounts to a secret agreement to monitor the pulpits of ill-favored churches. The serious danger, as former Justice Department attorney J. Christian Adams told Fox News, is that the IRS will start treating “theology as politics,” and regulate it accordingly.

Lovers of liberty should be very concerned.

According to a June 27 IRS letter to the Justice Department, 99 churches merit “high priority examination” for allegedly illegal electioneering activities. The letter was sent in reference to a now-dismissed lawsuit filed by the atheist group known as the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF). The suit originally was a rather broad one, demanding not only that the IRS enforce prohibitions against churches’ endorsing candidates specifically, but also that churches should be “required to file” what it described as “detailed annual information” that would force them (if they are like other nonprofits) to “expend substantial time and resources.”

With the end of the suit, those filings presumably will not be required (though a second suit, on just that subject, remains open). But IRS’s monitoring of alleged electioneering activities could still be quite onerous.

Traditionally, churches have been free to do just about anything short of outright candidate endorsements. Conservatives have suggested that not even that prohibition is enforced against traditionally liberal churches in black communities and that FFRF isn’t much concerned with such groups. But at least for conservative-leaning churches, FFRF has a much more restrictive agenda in mind.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atheism; atheist; atheists; christianpersecution; church; irs; irsscandals; jchristianadams; theologyaspolitics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
"Is freedom anything else than the right to live as we wish?
Nothing else."

~Epictetus




God bless this site, this Free Republic.
Please click the pic


21 posted on 08/04/2014 9:09:58 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Tragically, your Pastor is a rarity in today’s world.

TREASURE HIM!


22 posted on 08/04/2014 9:35:00 AM PDT by bimboeruption (REMEMBER MISSISSIPPI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Well, there's "what the market will bear" and there's "what the people will bear".

At some point, the price of a given good or commodity slows or halts sales. Obviously, though, no matter how expensive or intrusive our "Constitutionally Limited Republican" form of government gets, the people will bear it and are doing so.

23 posted on 08/04/2014 9:39:52 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

RE: , the people will bear it and are doing so.

I think there’s one simple explanation... IT DOES NOT HAVE A DIRECT BEARING ON MOST PEOPLE’s LIVES, at least not now.

It’s “only” 99 churches the IRS is persecuting. Therefore, it does not concern them.

Remember the provocative poem attributed to pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis’ rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group?

“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”


24 posted on 08/04/2014 9:44:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

nk it was the E.P.A. that was getting sued over different policies they couldn’t do on their own by “friendly environmental groups. Once it any to court they’d surrender without a real fight and create the policy they couldn’t get any way on their own plus have the defense they lost in court. I suspect this is a similar case as part of peeping the battlefield for 2016


25 posted on 08/04/2014 10:50:53 PM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson