Posted on 08/04/2014 7:01:31 AM PDT by wagglebee
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Meh. It’s re-branding. Happens all the time. I mean, it’s horrifying that you make corporate decisions for something like this, but that’s all it is. It’s like Libtards abandoning “liberal” for “progressive”.
Well, if they're going to support what everyone knows is murder, then yeah, they are just going to have to suck it up and get used to defending themselves.
Maybe if *pro-choice* doesn't work for them any more, they could go with *anti-life* or *anti-baby* or *baby killers*.
There's lots of options out there.
Yes. PP’s slogan will now be “End Pregnancy Now.”
>> the term pro-choice... does not reflect the range of womens health and economic issues now being debated.
Then may I suggest the term “vaginacentric” for your “womyn’s movement” — because that’s what life is all about, right?
Yeah, like that will work...
Perhaps they’ll start using “Pro-reproductive rights”. That encompasses baby murder and the contraceptive faux-issue that the Libs have been screeching about since Sandra Fluke & now the Hobby Lobby decision.
and not the least of which is they could have had by now potentially 60,000,000 more on their side, but something happened to them along the way.
Strangely, it’s re-branding w/o a brand. Usually, when you drop one brand-name, you have another to replace it. Not so here.
Well, from the picture accompanying the article, it looks as if they’re ready to just go ahead full-bore with A.O.D — Abortion on Demand.
I think that would be an excellent change — less obfuscatory.
They were never pro-choice. If they were, they wouldn’t be against pro-lifers. A pro-choicer respect the choice of others. Pro-abortioner is the more correct term. They celebrate abortions and abortion milestones. The more abortion the better and a decision for life is consider a negative
Liberals are like locusts. They descend on a name, consume it, and move on.
Yeah, I know it makes no sense... But there you go.
That way they can brand their opposition as "Against Women", which is what passes for reasoned debate, these days.
I was asked, as a male, if I was “Pro Choice.
“Of course”, I said, “I’m in favor of everyone having the right to “CHOOSE” their favorite sports team, their favorite food, the car they want to drive, the TV shows to watch, the books to read, the music to listen to, the——”
She countered, “I meant do you favor my right to get an abortion?”
My retort, “But that is NOT what you asked me. Why are you afraid of asking what you MEANT?”
If the Pro-Lifers were smart, they would start calling themselves “Pro-Women” at every opportunity, if only to muddy the waters.
>>Im in favor of everyone having the right to CHOOSE their favorite sports team
Not me. They should be compelled to like my favorite team. What a wonderful world it would be. But I don’t claim to be an A student.
“Explaining the contradiction, Ms. Laguens said these self-described pro-life voters were talking about their personal decision-making, for themselves, and not about what they want to push on others.”
Wow, “not about what they want to PUSH on others.” There’s a stunning quote.
I’ve caused a few Lib heads to explode because I refuse to use the term “Pro-choice”. If they use that terminology, I always say immediately in response “Oh, you’re ‘Pro-abortion’”. Using that terminology evokes a reaction like pouring water on the wicked witch - they hate it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.