That is not deceit, it is a reflection of the parsing I made of your statement.
Anger has nothing to do with my post. More to the point, it is disappointment as I expect more of those on this forum to be reasonable by way of an intelligent observation of the given facts and reasonable interpretation of the data set that has been provided from multiple sources.
You may find is as suspect as you desire. I have nothing to hide and only wish to help end the unbelievable nonsense being spread upon these “Ebola” threads as it reflects negatively upon FR as a whole, IMO.
Bull shit...You clearly implied and suggested I was an ignorant fool, who's cowering in dire fear for the rest of eternity, who's determined to live a life of ignorance.
Did ya forget what ya just typed out?
All this BS because I told ya I believe little or nothing this government and media says or reports.
Again you seem inordinately angry about how I feel about trusting media and this government.
I have nothing to hide and only wish to help end the unbelievable nonsense being spread upon these “Ebola” threads as it reflects negatively upon FR as a whole, IMO.
That's got zip to do with what I told you slick.
In fact I think you reflect negatively on FR, with your wild reckless suggestions and baseless implications.
Back in my day when we received edited and screened news and opinion from three cloned networks, usually a week late, it was easier to say that we were in the dark, almost continuously. But not today.
What we have today are thousands of sources, most of them inaccurate or at best incomplete, and much of it supposition. So when a reader absorbs it, and then repeats the supposition as factual, the facts become distorted or are just nonsense.
The trick now is to weed through all that smoke and try to determine how much if any of it makes sense when applied to a base of solid known facts.
Unfortunately, some people are not very good at doing that is the social media environment, and that may not be a very good thing over time.