Posted on 08/14/2014 9:07:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Know your enemy. To know what ISIS is, we have to clear away the media myths about ISIS.
ISIS is not a new phenomenon.
Wahhabi armies have been attacking Iraq in order to wipe out Shiites for over two hundred years. One of the more notably brutal attacks took place during the administration of President Thomas Jefferson.
That same year the Marine Corps saw action against the Barbary Pirates and West Point opened, but even Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore and Howard Zinn chiming via Ouija board would have trouble blaming the Wahhabi assault on the Iraqi city of Kerbala in 1802 on the United States or an oil pipeline.
Forget the media portrayals of ISIS as a new extreme group that even the newly moderate Al Qaeda thinks is over the top; its armies are doing the same things that Wahhabi armies have been doing for centuries. ISIS has Twitter accounts, pickup trucks and other borrowed Western technology, but its ideology and brutality have always been part of Islam. They are not a new phenomenon.
Sunnis and Shiites have been killing each other for over a thousand years. Declaring other Muslims to be infidels and killing them is also a lot older than the suicide bomb vest.
Al Qaeda and ISIS are at odds because its Iraqi namesake had a different agenda. Al Qaeda always had different factions with their own agendas that were not more extreme or less extreme, but emerged from varying national backgrounds.
Bin Laden prioritized Saudi Arabia and America. That allowed Al Qaeda to pick up training from Hezbollah which helped make 9/11 possible. This low level cooperation with Iran was endangered when Al Qaeda in Iraq made fighting a religious war with Shiites into its priority.
That did not mean that Bin Laden liked Shiites and thought that AQIQ was “extreme” for killing them.
During the Iraq War, Bin Laden had endorsed Al Qaeda in Iraq’s goal of fighting the Shiite “Rejectionists” by framing it as an attack on America. AQIQ’s Zarqawi had privately made it clear that he would not pledge allegiance to Osama bin Laden unless the terrorist leader endorsed his campaign against Shiites.
Bin Laden and the Taliban had been equally comfortable with Sipahe Sahaba and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi which provided manpower for the Taliban while massacring Shiites in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Last year LEJ had killed over a hundred Shiite Hazaras in one bombing.
The narrative that ISIS was more extreme than Al Qaeda because it killed Shiites and other Muslims doesn’t hold up even in recent history.
The media finds it convenient to depict the rise of newly extremist groups being radicalized by American foreign policy, Israeli blockades or Danish cartoons. A closer look however shows us that these groups did not become radicalized, rather they increased their capabilities.
ISIS understood that targeting Shiites and later Kurds would make it more appealing to Sunni Arabs inside Iraq and around the Persian Gulf. Bin Laden tried to rally Muslims by attacking America. ISIS has rallied Muslims by killing Shiites, Kurds, Christians and anyone else who isn’t a proper Sunni Arab.
Every news report insists that ISIS is an extreme outlier, but if that were really true then it would not have been able to conquer sizable chunks of Iraq and Syria. ISIS became huge and powerful because its ideology drew the most fighters and the most financial support. ISIS is powerful because it’s popular.
ISIS has become more popular and more powerful than Al Qaeda because Muslims hate other Muslims even more than they hate America.
ISIS is not an outside force that inexplicably rolls across Iraq and terrorizes everyone in its path. It’s actually the public face of a Sunni coalition. When ISIS massacres Yazidis, it’s not just following an ideology; it’s giving Sunni Arabs what they want.
A surviving Yazidi refugee had told CNN that his Arab neighbors had joined in the killing. This wasn’t just ISIS terrorizing a helpless population. It was Islamic Supremacism in action.
ISIS is dominating Iraq and Syria because it draws on support from the Sunni Arab population. It has their support because it is killing or driving out Christians, Yazidis, Shiites and a long list of peoples who either aren’t Muslims or aren’t Arabs while giving their land and possessions to the Sunni Arabs.
The media spent years denying that the Syrian Civil War was a sectarian conflict between Sunnis and Shiites. It’s unable to deny the obvious in Iraq, but it carefully avoids considering the implications.
An army alone will have trouble committing genocide unless it has the cooperation of a local population that wants to see another group exterminated.
When we talk about ISIS, we are really talking about Sunni Arabs in Iraq and Syria. Not all of them, but enough that ISIS has become the standard bearer of the Sunni side in the civil wars in Syria and Iraq.
Hillary Clinton and John McCain can complain that we could have avoided the rise of ISIS if we had only armed the right sort of Jihadists in Syria, but if ISIS became dominant because its agenda had popular support, then it would not have mattered whom we armed or didn’t arm.
We armed the Iraqi military to the teeth, but it didn’t do any good because the military didn’t represent any larger consensus in an Iraq divided along religious and ethnic lines.
To understand ISIS, we have to unlearn what the media tell us. The media tells us that terrorists only represent an extreme edge of the population. If they have popular support, it’s only because the civilian population has somehow become radicalized. (And usually it’s our fault.)
And yet that model doesn’t hold up. It never did.
The religious and ethnic strife in the Middle East out of which ISIS emerged and which has become its brand, goes back over a thousand years. If support for terrorism emerges from radicalization, then the armies of Islam were radicalized in the time of Mohammed and have never been de-radicalized.
The Caliphate, like the Reich, is a utopia which can only be created through the mass murder and repression of all those who do not belong. This isn’t a new vision. It’s the founding vision of Islam.
What is wrong with ISIS is what is wrong with Islam.
We can defeat ISIS, but we should remember that its roots are in the hearts of the Sunni Muslims who support it. ISIS and Al Qaeda are only symptoms of the larger problem.
We can see the larger problem flying Jihadist flags in London and New Jersey. We can see it trooping through Australian and Canadian airports to join ISIS. We can see it in the eyes of the Sunni Arabs murdering their Yazidi neighbors.
ISIS is an expression of the murderous hate within Islam. We are not only at war with an acronym, but with the dark hatred in the hearts of Jihadists in Iraq and Pakistan… and next door.
“Wahhabi armies have been attacking Iraq in order to wipe out Shiites for over two hundred years.”
This goes back to the 7th century (or maybe earlier).
ISIS has shown the world what will happen in any country where Islam gains numerical superiority.
Ferguson, Mo has shown the world what will happen when blacks achieve numerical superiority through out this country.
The brutality of islam started from its very foundation.
Read up how Mohammed treated the Jews and Christians who had settled around Mecca and Medina.
Barbaric cruelty is part of Islam’s DNA.
The Caliphate, like the Reich, is a utopia which can only be created through the mass murder and repression of all those who do not belong. This isn’t a new vision. It’s the founding vision of Islam.
What is wrong with ISIS is what is wrong with Islam."
I constantly talk about how islam is violent and persecuting. My wife tries to convince me that the radicals are interpreting the Koran incorrectly and that it is a religion of peace. I tell her that muslim silence only shows that they approve of what is being done by the radicals.
Muslims really have to live a schizophrenic worldview.
On the one hand, they know that basic human decency requires them to be kind to their fellow men.
On the other hand, there’s the example of Muhammad who they consider the most perfect of men. This is the prophet who according to their own sources slaughtered people, married and had sex with an under-aged girl, and taught that Infidels ( i.e., non-Muslims ) should either convert or be treated unequally by Muslim authorities.
I would have to say that most Muslims who want to be decent have to IGNORE these unsavory aspects of Muhammad, or take their holy books seriously and really follow Muhammad’s example.
The closer one is to the Koran and Hadith and the more one takes them seriously, the more violent one becomes.
Lawrence of Arabia tried to unite the Arabs. Fortunately he failed. Like trying to homogenize oil and water.
Fortunately for us they are un-united and hate each other probably more than they hate America. Or is it that they are able to reach each other easier than us?
Lawrence....Lawrence of Arabia.
He's an English Guy
He came to fight the Turkish
I have two t-shirts that I wear in public. One says “Mohamed Sucks” and the other says “I stand with Israel.” The muslims here in Houston just give me dirty looks but none ever say anything to me. If they did I would simply point out their hypocrisy regarding their appearance (no Islamic garb) in public. The women often appear in public without a male escort and even drive cars!!! What would mad mo think of that?
The problem, as you point out, is that Christian Holy War is largely an oxymoron. Waging it requires carefully ignoring most of what Christianity stands for.
OTOH, for Muslims, not waging jihad requires the same studious inattention to the fundamentals of Islam.
The problem, as you point out, is that Christian Holy War is largely an oxymoron. Waging it requires carefully ignoring most of what Christianity stands for.
OTOH, for Muslims, not waging jihad requires the same studious inattention to the fundamentals of Islam.
Finally, someone willing to speak the truth.
1400 years – 250 MILLION innocents murdered by “the prophet" followers!!!
Why Should We Fear Islam? Dr. Bill Warner
The whole administration is stocked with islamic sympatizers!!!
Soldier tries to warn of the dangers of Islam!
Three Star General - Muslim Influence has penetrated Pentagon
CIA Hosting Muslim Terrorists!
Muslim Brotherhood Infiltrates the White House!
Who are the Palestinians REALLY?
Remember what Eric Nordstrom said in a Congressional hearing Oct 10, 2012 …."The Taliban is on the inside of the building"
Thus the joke that the only good muslim is a bad muslim.
If I did that here in Canada:
1) I would be fired from my job
2) I would be hauled before a human rights commission
3) I would be investigated by a RCMP hate crimes unit.
Glad there is still free speech in Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.