Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Straight Vermonter
You missed the point but that’s common on these frothing at the mouth threads.

What point did I miss? Be specific. You said (without any evidence, I might add), that it was an execution. I pointed out that it probably wasn't. So: what point did I miss?
53 posted on 08/15/2014 4:11:59 PM PDT by jjsheridan5 (Remember Mississippi -- leave the GOP plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: jjsheridan5
Let's try this again.

Here's the post I responded to: My limited knowledge of case law, very limited, leads me to believe that if the cop cannot demonstrate Imminent Threat, he's a candidate for Murder II.

My response was that the question of the cop being in imminent danger is the only thing that matters. The robbery at the store is not relevant. Many people on threads on this topic (including this one) seem to think that the cop should/could have shot the kid just for the robbery. That would be an execution.

execute [ek-si-kyoot]
verb (used with object), executed, executing.
4. to murder; assassinate.

58 posted on 08/15/2014 4:24:10 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson