“Facts? Facts you say? Eberybody gots facts”
“We wants blood.”
The foregoing is an adaptation of the supposed story from the OJ Simpson trial, wherein one or more jurors were said to react to the DNA evidence thusly:
“DNA, So what. Eberybody gots DNA”
"DNA, So what. Eberybody gots DNA”
That reminds of an idiotic comment in the Seattle Times yesterday: "The fact that there were no wounds in Brown's back doesn't mean anything - after all, there were areas in the front that weren't shot, either." What do you say to something like that?