Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Post editorials will no longer use ‘Redskins’ for the local NFL team
Washington Post ^ | August 22, 2014 | Editorial Board

Posted on 08/22/2014 1:22:31 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

THIS PAGE has for many years urged the local football team to change its name. The term “Redskins,” we wrote in 1992, “is really pretty offensive.” The team owner then, Jack Kent Cooke, disagreed, and the owner now, Daniel M. Snyder, disagrees, too. But the matter seems clearer to us now than ever, and while we wait for the National Football League to catch up with thoughtful opinion and common decency, we have decided that, except when it is essential for clarity or effect, we will no longer use the slur ourselves. That’s the standard we apply to all offensive vocabulary, and the team name unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too.

We were impressed this week by the quiet integrity of Mike Carey, who recently retired after 19 seasons as one of the NFL’s most respected referees. As recounted by Post columnist Mike Wise, Mr. Carey asked the league not to assign him to officiate any Washington games and, since 2006, the league granted his request. He never made any announcement about it. “It just became clear to me that to be in the middle of the field, where something disrespectful is happening, was probably not the best thing for me,” Mr. Carey said. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: msmthugs; nfl; redskins; wp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: refermech
Just call them the “foreskins”

If you mean those on the "editorial board", then I agree.....they're really ignorant dick-heads.

62 posted on 08/23/2014 1:33:19 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Why is the Washington Post editorial page writing about the Redskins period?!


63 posted on 08/23/2014 2:01:21 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

That they are!


64 posted on 08/23/2014 5:47:21 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This is understandable. Different people are offended by different things. For example, I am sometimes offended by Post content, such as the above editorial. Why can’t they just do the decent, reasoning thing and go out of business?

LOL!!

65 posted on 08/23/2014 7:22:45 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("LEX REX." ("The law is the king.") -- Samuel Rutherford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
KR will no longer use the Washington Post. (actually, that was as of c. 1973)

I sympathize -- it's hard to boycott a paper you wouldn't read for free in Starbucks. When I was growing up in DC, there were two papers: the Washington Star (for normal Americans) and the Washington Post (for Democrats). We would never have the Post in our house.

66 posted on 08/23/2014 7:31:56 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("LEX REX." ("The law is the king.") -- Samuel Rutherford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
WaPo is run by a bunch of smarmy little jerks. Their moral superiority smells to high heaven.

Last year, the WaPo was bought by Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon.com. So, yeah... leftie moral superiority.

67 posted on 08/23/2014 7:36:39 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("LEX REX." ("The law is the king.") -- Samuel Rutherford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
But I now know how the expression “Dumb as a Post” became a synonym for stupid

Nice one!

68 posted on 08/23/2014 7:37:31 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("LEX REX." ("The law is the king.") -- Samuel Rutherford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

[Why is the Washington Post editorial page writing about the Redskins period?!]

Great point!


69 posted on 08/23/2014 11:34:50 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
That probably hasn’t gone on since the end of Camelot. Nowadays D.C. `power people’ suck up to the likes of Sally Quinn or Michelle Obama. Really class acts, both of them.

I like the shots of Moochelle's butt going through a doorway. It's always an adventure in architectural survival.

70 posted on 08/23/2014 2:36:53 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee; DuncanWaring
[What are they going to do? Call them “The R-words”?]

The Ebonyskins.



"Redmen".

"Ruddymen".

"Assassins, genocides, and cannibalizers of the original Eurasian paleo-occupants of America".

Oops. Now I've done it.

71 posted on 08/23/2014 2:43:05 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

LOL!


72 posted on 08/23/2014 2:45:11 PM PDT by Taxman (I am mad as Hell and I am not going to take it any more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

“...an adventure in architectural survival.”

LOL! I like to refer to Hillary as “The Flying Buttress” but she has some dangerous competition. They don’t like each other too much, either.


73 posted on 08/23/2014 6:12:06 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Society changes its views not based upon society, but based upon media propagandists. The media as way too much discretionary controll over acceptability of our thought processes as they pit us against one another.


74 posted on 08/23/2014 8:06:44 PM PDT by apoliticalone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson