Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative
"Black cop...white victim...nothing to see here.My standards would be just the same as they would be for white cop,black victim.It’s my understanding that there was some sort of serious,or potentially serious,situation occurring at the time and during it the black cop ordered the white guy to raise his hands but he failed to do so because,most likely,he didn’t *hear* the order because he was wearing headphones.Sounds plausible to me.With that info I’m not prepared to claim “wrongful shooting”.With additional info I may,or may not,change my mind."

Totally disagree. Given the facts presented this would be minimum 3rd degree manslaughter.

Take away the badge and lets say the shooter was a civilian with a concealed weapon. Still think the shooting may be justified? If not then you must ask why does a badge make it ok?

Being a cop does not give you a pass and in fact cops should be much more prepared to make the right decision than a civilian. If police are not held to the same proctorial standards as anyone else in the use of deadly force then we as a society are literally giving them a license to commit murder.

13 posted on 08/28/2014 8:13:10 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: precisionshootist
Still think the shooting may be justified?

Well...no.Simply because an ordinary civilian doesn't have the legal authority to order another to raise his/her hands.Yet,under certain circumstances,a cop *does* have that authority.

15 posted on 08/28/2014 8:16:30 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party policy;Lie,deny,refuse to comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: precisionshootist
Being a cop does not give you a pass and in fact cops should be much more prepared to make the right decision than a civilian. If police are not held to the same proctorial standards as anyone else in the use of deadly force then we as a society are literally giving them a license to commit murder.

Correct. The cop had his gun on the guy. The perp moving his hand to his waist is not a "threatening gesture" unless and until the cop could see him withdraw a weapon. It's a movement, not necessarily a threatening movement. Making such a hair-trigger interpretation of what might be a threat is way beyond the limits of logic or justice, especially when policing is not nearly as dangerous as being a farmer, fisherman, or woodsman.

People make mistakes. People get stoned. Some are simply retarded or disoriented. Some just freak when confronted by a gun (whoda thunk it?). They don't deserve to die for that.

22 posted on 08/28/2014 9:08:58 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson