To: Lorianne
That spiderweb map of “IS Control” is a little misleading. A lot of the area between the web is barren desert that nobody cares about. Technically, you could say that IS doesn’t control it, because they don’t have much air power to patrol it, or columns of armor to push through it. Still, if they control all the major roads and towns surrounding those areas, then they are effectively under their control.
4 posted on
08/28/2014 4:08:05 PM PDT by
Boogieman
To: Boogieman
The practical reality is they control the territory. It’s like saying Utah and Arizona don’t control all the deserts off the rivers and roads
Syria and Iraq are partitioned.
6 posted on
08/28/2014 4:16:07 PM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: Boogieman
That spiderweb map of IS Control is a little misleading. A lot of the area between the web is barren desert that nobody cares about. Technically, you could say that IS doesnt control it, because they dont have much air power to patrol it, or columns of armor to push through it. Still, if they control all the major roads and towns surrounding those areas, then they are effectively under their control.
Which means their "control" is tenuous at best and can be broken easily by a committed, well-armed force.
7 posted on
08/28/2014 4:20:10 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson