I wonder if I’d be able to find that source, to see what was cited.
If the principle of abrogation is specifically stated in the Quran or hadiths then Muslims would be combatants regardless of the percentage issue, since Mohammed’s later, violent commands would replace any of his earlier, more peaceful quotes that people use when claiming that Islam is a “religion of peace”.
It would be interesting to ask Muslims why they don’t routinely kill non-Muslims in America and other places, as commanded in the Quran. It would be interesting to ask them why they haven’t executed Obama as an apostate yet, as commanded in the Quran. For them to have an official excuse, there must be something written about when that command is required and when it is simply a goal to strive for.
Muslims are admonished to fight when strong enough to be victorious over the enemy BUT to engage in hudna when they cannot win a military victory (or when they need to reload).
Since they have no chance of winning a frontal assault at the present time against the West AND since the liberal immigration policies in Europe, Australia, Canada, and U.S. have permitted to enter in great numbers, they do not need to fight at this point to satisfy Koran/Hadiths...they just have an ongoing hudna and engage in Da'wah (proselytize).
When they have built sufficient strength or have a sufficiently well-designed terror infrastructure, they will again engage in military action.