Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/31/2014 9:19:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Did you know that John Kerry was in Viet... oops, I mean Mike Brown was unarmed ?


2 posted on 08/31/2014 9:34:14 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

To save my life or the life of another...

Or if he is wearing a striped tie with a striped shirt. ..


4 posted on 08/31/2014 9:47:05 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The ultimate crime is a striped tie with a checkered shirt..just had to be done...


5 posted on 08/31/2014 9:48:22 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Answer:
When I feel my life may be in danger.
When that person is in my home.
When I feel my wife or children are in danger of bodily harm.
When I can’t see his/her hands and think the person is armed...


6 posted on 08/31/2014 10:04:08 PM PDT by Hambone02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If a woman shot and killed a man who attempted to rape her, would the MSM endlessly repeat that he was unarmed?

It is always good to read Andrew Branca.

9 posted on 08/31/2014 11:20:49 PM PDT by TChad (The Obamacare motto: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

disparity of force actually covers all the examples they subcategorized underneath it. disparity of numbers is disparity of force. disparity of size is disparity of force. disparity of all the things they noted are disparity of force.

disparity of force also covers ambush/surprise attack.


10 posted on 08/31/2014 11:39:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In uber lib Ca we can defend ourselves, others, our property and dare I say it- put down riots through the use of deadly force.

http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/197.html

197. Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in
any of the following cases:
1. When resisting any attempt to murder any person, or to commit a
felony, or to do some great bodily injury upon any person; or,
2. When committed in defense of habitation, property, or person,
against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or
surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends
and endeavors, in a violent, riotous or tumultuous manner, to enter
the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any
person therein; or,
3. When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a
wife or husband, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such
person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to
commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent
danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the
person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he was the assailant
or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have
endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was
committed; or,
4. When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and
means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in
lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving
the peace.


12 posted on 09/01/2014 12:41:00 AM PDT by NoLibZone (The bad news: Hillary Clinton will be the next President. The Good news: Our principles are intact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Citizens shoot unarmed attackers all the time and its a good thing they do.


14 posted on 09/01/2014 4:25:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Here’s how my concealed carry course put it: in Texas, if you are in an altercation and use deadly force in the form of a gun, you will most likely be vindicated (although he pointed out several examples where that wasn’t the case). It’s just very difficult to get a conviction in Texas against someone using a firearm to drop someone else engaged in thuggish behavior.

That said, you almost certainly will have to spend extravagantly to defend that shoot. Your justified use of a firearm as lethal force is a FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLAR event. And. Given the ensuing disruption to your life, that’s not nearly the only cost. Now, add back in the unpredictability of the legal system, and using a firearm, legally, is more disruptive than anything that can happen in your life just short of being exposed to lethal force against you.

You had better be facing lethal force when you shoot, or you have just made a costly choice by comparison...


15 posted on 09/01/2014 5:12:01 AM PDT by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Only when a Grand Jury and or a District/Federal Attorney says its OK?

sarcasm

16 posted on 09/01/2014 5:52:17 AM PDT by buckalfa (Long time caller --- first time listener.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What percentage of rape victims were attacked by an “unarmed” rapist?

The entire point of carrying a firearm is to even the odds against attackers who are better prepared to assault you physically. If all the perps in the world were 5 year old girls, we wouldn’t need to carry firearms.


17 posted on 09/01/2014 5:55:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good exposition of the law(s) pertaining to deadly force.

I do think, however, that cops have it easier in some ways, but harder in others. Cops are supposed to, through use of command presence and tactical smarts, avoid situations where shooting a civilian might become justified.I imagine this is much harder than most stories about poor officer Wilson let on.


19 posted on 09/01/2014 5:59:42 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When can you legally use a gun against an unarmed person?

In many states a person can use deadly force even if they are not protecting themself or another person from an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. For example, in many states a person can use deadly force to stop an arson, kidnapping, burglary of a dwelling place, or sexual assault (other than statutory rape).

21 posted on 09/01/2014 6:07:04 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Here in the People’s Socialist RepuliK of Illinois (which mirrors California alot!) once a perp turns his back and attempts to flee a situation, the law says we have to let him go. Unfortunately.


23 posted on 09/01/2014 6:13:53 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“it is merely one of perhaps an infinite number of means of exerting force. “

another is storing force in your mass to unload at a specific point, as Brown was doing.


24 posted on 09/01/2014 6:17:03 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Big Mike was strong armed.


26 posted on 09/01/2014 6:39:24 AM PDT by rwa265 (Love one another as I have loved you, says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is the US about to follow in the ridiculous path of the UK?

This push back by the criminal community is not unexpected as they continue to lose increasing numbers in their ranks.

This is a occupational hazard and they are organizing to increase their workplace safety.

No calls for a work stoppage though!


27 posted on 09/01/2014 7:19:19 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson