Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brad from Tennessee

There is s difference between guiding an airliner into a building and taking the full control from takeoff to suicide-crash. If the pilot doesn’t really know what he is doing, he will crash it before he gets off the ground.


16 posted on 09/02/2014 2:26:46 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

Unfortunately many of the pilots went over to the new regime I imagine.

Airbus and Bombardiar it looks like. These will be time bombs for decades.


21 posted on 09/02/2014 2:30:22 PM PDT by KC Burke (Gowdy for Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

that would be best case scenario- but I usually go for worst case scenario and pleasantly surprised if best case occurs.


110 posted on 09/03/2014 5:11:43 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

With modern avionics, you really don’t need a pilot in the cockpit. Just someone knowledgeable enough to punch in coordinates. When the 757 and 767 were flight tested back in the 1980s, Boeing had the planes take off, fly, and land by remote control, all to defeat the ALPA insistence that there be flight engineers in the cockpit.


132 posted on 09/03/2014 6:51:36 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson