Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway; ElenaM
Good discussion of this here:Virology Down Under

Hat tip goes to ElenaM.

16 posted on 09/04/2014 1:43:56 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Thanks for the H/T. I am bothered by the hair-splicing over the various forms of inhalation transmission. Sure it’s scientifically accurate to say it isn’t transmissible via droplet nuclei as is influenza, but insisting that it isn’t “airborne” is grossly misleading to non-medical and non-scientific people.

The fact is, infected people produce virus particles in their saliva and lung secretions, both of which are expelled from the body into the environment via coughing and sneezing. Anyone within three feet of the infected individual can inhale those secretions and become infected without ever coming in direct physical contact with the viral source. And no one wants to talk about environmental contamination, which I think is even more serious than the droplet vector.

In light of the hair-splicing and diversions I doubt there is any chance of containing this virus before the body count becomes insanely huge.


26 posted on 09/04/2014 2:41:07 AM PDT by ElenaM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson