Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
In BNP leaflets, the adjective ‘Pakistani’ was replaced by ‘Muslim’. In what way is this distinction relevant?

Because the fact that they were Muslim is more telling than the fact that they were from Pakistan - because even if there are only precious few Pakistanis in the U.K. who aren't Muslim, it still deserves pointing out that aren't just "from another country," but "Muslim."

Imagine reading a report that a group of youths - "two Egyptians, one Sudanese, two Saudis, and three Indonesians" - had been arrested for carrying a bomb into an airport. And let's observe that they also had "religious leaflets" with them. According to your logic, it wouldn't be relevant to instead report that eight MUSLIMS had been attempting to smuggle a bomb into the airport (since virtually all citizens of those countries are Muslim), and that they had been carrying leaflets calling for a "worldwide djihad" (since that can almost be taken for granted, given the first item).

Regards,

19 posted on 09/04/2014 10:38:23 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek
it still deserves pointing out that aren't just "from another country,"

Pakistani and Asian in UK don't (mostly) refer to immigrants from those countries. It refers to racial/ethnic groups, most of the members of which were born in UK.

35 posted on 09/04/2014 11:46:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins most of the battles. Reality wins ALL the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson