Mr. Crump couldn't beat a mouse through a maze racing for a piece of cheese. George Zimmerman was charged with second-degree murder, not manslaughter, wasn't he? And these people still haven't heard what NBC news did to that audiotape? Plus, Trayvon had a can of watermelon juice, not iced tea.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Lots of quota babies in law.
Holder is one.
Obama is one.
And the combined ability in law of both is 5 on a scale of 0 to 100.
Clarance Thomas would clean their clocks in any real debate.
2 posted on
09/04/2014 1:39:27 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Since when is pounding somebody else's head into the pavement a "Civil Right"?
Even if he is a 'white Hispanic'?
3 posted on
09/04/2014 1:39:27 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Couldn’t find a compelling reason to justify smashing someone’s skull into mush on a sidewalk?
4 posted on
09/04/2014 1:40:06 PM PDT by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Uh, because there was no there there?
6 posted on
09/04/2014 1:43:27 PM PDT by
rktman
(Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sucker punching the neighborhood watch is a civil right?
7 posted on
09/04/2014 1:45:08 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Regarding federal civil rights laws dealing with race issues, please beware of the following.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
With all due respect to Trayvon Martin and his family and supporters, and freedman issues aside, the only race-based right which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights as evidenced by the 15th Amendment.
In other words, any race-themed federal civil rights laws which do not deal with voting issues are constitutionally indefensible imo. Such laws were likely established by Constitution-ignoring lawmakers to win votes from low-information voters.
So perhaps Attorney General Eric Holder's inaction on this issue reflects awareness on his part of the federal government's constitutionally limited powers.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m afraid the morons were taken for a ride by an Attorney General who was never going to do anything more than use it to keep the slaves on the plantation.
14 posted on
09/04/2014 2:00:10 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The case largely centered on a debate over whether Zimmerman was defending himself although he was the one who confronted and pursued Martin against the advice of a 911 operator. This article has more holes than a block of Swiss cheese...and repeating lies does not make them true.
15 posted on
09/04/2014 2:03:55 PM PDT by
JPG
("So sue me". OK, we will.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bottom line: Martin is dead and Zimmerman is alive. Zimmerman did what he had to do and the outcome speaks for itself.
19 posted on
09/04/2014 2:14:42 PM PDT by
Dr. Thorne
("Don't be afraid. Just believe." - Mark 5:36)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They're not the only ones who want to see justice prevail
22 posted on
09/04/2014 3:16:36 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
("If you want to test a man's character, give him power." -- Abraham Lincoln)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Despite the outrage and demands for justice after Zimmerman was acquitted of manslaughter, Attorney General Eric Holder has yet to announce a clear answer on his findings in the shooting of the unarmed 17-year-old who quickly became a household name across America. Maybe that's because it all came out at trial.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson