Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State cuts 2015 'Obamacare' rate hikes by more than 50 percent (New York)
Syracuse Post-Standard ^ | September 4, 2014 | By James T. Mulder

Posted on 09/04/2014 5:19:49 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Syracuse, N.Y. -- Rate increases requested by health insurers offering "Obamacare" coverage through the New York's health insurance exchange have been cut by more than 50 percent.

The state Department of Financial Services said today insurers offering individual coverage on the exchange had asked for an average increase of 12.5 percent for 2015. The department reduced the average increase to 5.7 percent.

The state's action was praised by a consumer group and criticized by the insurance industry.

"This is great news for consumers and small employers alike," said Elisabeth Benjamin, a co-founder of Health Care for All New York, a coalition of consumer groups.

The New York Health Plan Association, which represents insurers, called the state's decision to significantly cut rate requests "irresponsible."

Paul Macielak, president and CEO of the association, said the state's rate decision " ... will create unnecessary turmoil in the market and will lead some plans to make business decisions that might include eliminating or reducing product offerings, withdrawing from regions or even withdrawing from the marketplace entirely."

(Excerpt) Read more at syracuse.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: election2014; exchanges; failure; newyork; obamacare; obamacareinsurers; obamacarepremiums; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Price controls. Venezuela. Toilet paper. Socialism fails every time it's tried.
1 posted on 09/04/2014 5:19:50 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The insurers will see more of this now that they made a deal with the devil. (government)

What it will ultimately result in is insurers bailing out of the networks.


2 posted on 09/04/2014 5:22:15 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Physicians everywhere are longer taking patients on Obamacare or Medicare. They can’t afford to and the hassle’s not worth it.


3 posted on 09/04/2014 5:24:08 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Gee, I wonder how many companies will be back there offering policies next year.


4 posted on 09/04/2014 5:24:25 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh but this time it will be different 'cause Obama's so smart /s
5 posted on 09/04/2014 5:24:35 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
..and will lead some plans to make business decisions that might include eliminating or reducing product offerings, withdrawing from regions or even withdrawing from the marketplace entirely."

All talk.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-insurance-bailout-20140521-story.html#page=1

6 posted on 09/04/2014 5:26:00 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I wonder how high the deductibles will be. The provider lists will shrink, and they’re going to have a heck of a time enrolling specialists.


7 posted on 09/04/2014 5:30:27 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.

- Thank you Chief Justice John Roberts

- You created an illegalunconstitutional additional federal income tax based on Communism

- Single seniors will have to pay for young welfare-sucking dropping babies from many different “Baby Daddies” like Jesse High-Jackson

- May those on the Supreme Court that backed this shiite soon meet a slow and painful end -

.


8 posted on 09/04/2014 5:36:48 PM PDT by devolve (- "If Obama puts on a USMC t-shirt to play basketball it does not mean he has any balls! -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This has been going on for years and years. The insurers ask the world and they get a lot less than they ask for.


9 posted on 09/04/2014 5:38:33 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Love the pure spin of the headline.

Obamacare rates will increase by 6% in 2015!

But they could have been 12% so let’s go with the headline of...

Obamacare rate increases cut by 50%

Low info approved.


10 posted on 09/04/2014 5:38:48 PM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"This is great news for consumers and small employers alike," said Elisabeth Benjamin, a co-founder of Health Care for All New York, a coalition of consumer groups.

As a normal person, I would simply ask the rhetorical question, which is unlikely to be answered by the twit Benjamin, or any other Obama-loving "consumer group:"

If the vast majority of workers (with or without a job) can't afford the previous premiums, AND DEDUCTIBLES, what difference does it make if the increase is 7.5 or 15%?

Bottom line... ADA or Obamacare still sucks!

11 posted on 09/04/2014 5:39:15 PM PDT by publius911 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Physicians everywhere are longer taking patients on Obamacare or Medicare.

I think you lost the word "no" somewhere in that sentence...

12 posted on 09/04/2014 5:42:06 PM PDT by publius911 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
. . . An attempt to reduce Democratic losses in November?

The piper to be paid—more doctors who leave the business—will be paid later.

13 posted on 09/04/2014 5:43:50 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Why didn’t they reduce the increase to 0%? Why not throw in free back rubs?


14 posted on 09/04/2014 5:44:00 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yep that’s what I was thinking, the market cannot be overcome by state control.


15 posted on 09/04/2014 5:48:09 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/obamacare-chickens-come-home-to-roost-lpsb/

Obamacare Chickens Come Home to Roost @ LPSB
By Walter Abbott

A provision of Obamacare that requires employees that work 30 or more hours a week to be “full-time” and eligible for medical coverage caused somewhat of a stir at last night’s meeting of the Lincoln Parish School Board (LPSB). It seems that in addition to the 828 or so full-time employees (teachers, staff, and support), the district has between 200 and 300 part-time employees – substitute teachers, para-professionals, cafeteria, maintenance, and other contract employees that are paid by the hour.

Effective January 1, 2015, any of those employees that work more than 30 hours/week will have to be offered medical coverage. That would cost the district about $2 million/year if all the part-time employees are enrolled, said David Charpentier, of Brown & Brown Insurance, a consultant who has advised the board in the past.

Said Charpentier, “You can offer coverage to these individuals on the same basis that you offer it to everybody else, and you would have to find another approximately $2 million per year in your budget to do that.” He added, “Or you could ignore the issue, and the government would, after you sent your reporting package in where you self report in January 2016, the government would send you a bill for a fine of about $2.7 million, for not having offered coverage to a sufficient number of your full-time employees, as defined by them.”

When the discussion centered around reducing the hours of the employees to less than 30 hours/week, and possibly increasing their hourly pay to compensate, District Eleven’s George Mack, Jr. sharply questioned that plan.

Said Mack, “Here in Lincoln, it’s a question of equity and fairness. The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is the law of the land, is it not? So our objective is not to circumvent the law. That’s not what you’re trying to do, is it?” Mack went on, “How do we mitigate, how do we balance, taking care of people that we’re responsible for?”

Business Manager George Murphy noted that last year the board staff had begun to make plans to implement the reduced hours, but the Obamacare decree was delayed for a year.

Murphy said the plan was not an attempt to circumvent the law, but was in fact compliance.

Said Murphy, “Every time that we’ve talked about this, the words that we’ve used is were doing this is to comply with the law.” He added, “To me, circumventing the law is we know about the law, but we’re not going to do anything about it.”

Murphy noted that several years ago when sales tax receipts declined, several dozen full-time employee positions were eliminated and replaced with part-timers in order to stay solvent.

Charpentier noted that many companies in the private sector are going out of business, because the can’t afford to pay for the coverage.

As the discussion ebbed and flowed, it appeared that most all the board members were resigned to the reduced hours plan.

We’ll have more reporting later on the rest of the meeting.


16 posted on 09/04/2014 5:50:20 PM PDT by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Depends on whether the insurers were smart or not.

Smart would be expecting the rates to get cut, so asking for higher rates to start with. So say they wanted a 5% increase, asked for 12% and actually got 5.7%.

But thats if they were smart.


17 posted on 09/04/2014 5:52:59 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Scumbags. Still $150/month increase on my damn rates. # them!


18 posted on 09/04/2014 6:12:22 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> “This is great news for consumers and small employers alike,” said Elisabeth Benjamin,

Like Hell it is, dumb ass. I’m now seeing an effective 17% insurance increase since Commie Care take effect last January.


19 posted on 09/04/2014 6:17:09 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

All part of the plan to force a single payer government insurance by making it impossible for the private insurers to get the increases they need.

They will begin to withdraw from states that prevent them from making a profit.


20 posted on 09/04/2014 6:24:51 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a murderer, and find one... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson