Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weezel

“DNA cannot prove innocence, it can only prove guilt.These men who admitted doing it could have still done it, but just did not leave DNA behind, same as not leaving finger prints.”

It’s pretty hard not to leave DNA behind; even a handshake exchanges DNA. Moreover, the absence of your DNA, and the presence of someone else’s DNA, tends to point rather firmly in the direction of their guilt, and not yours.


8 posted on 09/06/2014 5:49:30 AM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CondorFlight

Certainly does but still, no DNA is no different than no finger prints, it cannot prove innocence.


40 posted on 09/07/2014 5:03:12 AM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson