“Islam teaches peace”
Source please. Where in the Koran is that?
George W. Bush.
“Source please. Where in the Koran is that?”
When all nonbelievers are killed or converted to their sick ways, that is considered “peace”.
There will be peace according to islamists after the entire world submits to their caliphate. When the entire world is Islamic. That’s the only peace they know. Until then, it’s pure war, rape, slavery, pillage.
“Islam teaches peace”
Source please. Where in the Koran is that? —
You don’t understand arabic.
Islam does not mean Islam
Teaches does not mean teaches
Peace does not mean peace.
Islam does teach peace. It is just that their definition is different from ours. Opposite in fact.
It’s Time to Take the Islamic State Seriously (Excellent Analysis!)
Crisis Magazine ^ | September 23, 2014 | REV. JAMES V. SCHALL, S.J.
Islam has no central or definitive body or figure authorized to define what exactly it is. Opinions about its essence and scope vary widely according to the political or philosophic background of its own interpreters. The current effort to establish an Islamic State, with a designated Caliph, again to take up the mission assigned to Islam, brings to our attention the question: “What is Islam?”
The issue of “terror” is a further aspect of this same understanding. Many outside Islam seek to separate “terror” and “Islam” as if they were, in their usage, independent or even opposed ideas. This latter view is almost impossible seriously to maintain in the light of Islamic history and the text of the Qur’an itself.
John Kerry, however, insists that what we see is “terrorism” with nothing to do with Islam. The Obama administration seems to have a rule never to identify Islam with “terrorism,” no matter what the evidence or what representatives of the Islamic State themselves say.
Ecumenism and liberalism both, in their differing ways, because of their commitment to tolerance and free speech, make it difficult to deal with what is happening in Islamic states. Islam is not friendly to relativism or to subtle distinctions.
Is terror intrinsic to Islam?
Yet, we can ask: is this Islamic State anything more than a pipe-dream? No Islamic state has any serious possibility of defeating modern armies. But, ironically, they no longer think that modern armies will be necessary. They are convinced that widespread use of terrorism and other means of civil disorder can be successful. No one really has the will or the means to control the destructive forces that the Islamic State already has in place.
Finally, the case of the Islamic State and of the jihadists is not just a threat arising out of Islam’s mission to conquer the world for Allah. It is also a moral case, that the life of the West is atheist and decadent. It does not deserve its prosperity and position. The mission of mankind is the submission to Allah in all things.
It is easy to write this movement off as fanatical and ruthless, which it is. To the outside world, it sounds horrific, but I suspect not to those who believe its truth and see the current revival of Islam with relief. The second or third class ranking of Islam in the modern world is over. But to the degree that we misjudge what is motivating the renewal of Islam, we will never understand why it exists as it does.
Full truth about Islam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3207048/posts
MESSAGE TO OBAMA ABOUT ISIS
Some of you may be familiar with the history of the beginning of Islam. If you can, please check in the Koran the references provided by Rashid.
Brother Rashid in a message to Obama about ISIS (in English).
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=698996990181639