Posted on 09/29/2014 6:36:57 AM PDT by SJackson
Allah Made Me Do It
Posted By Daniel Greenfield On September 29, 2014 @ 12:24 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 19 Comments
Stop me if you’ve heard this story before.
A Muslim convert who recently became very religious beheads a woman while reportedly shouting Islamic phrases. The authorities rush to convince everyone in sight that it has nothing to do with Islam.
I’m not talking about Alton Nolen in Oklahoma at the end of September, but Nicholas Salvador in the UK at the beginning of September. Salvador, a Nigerian Muslim convert, beheaded an 82-year-old European woman with a foot-long blade. Nolen killed a 54-year-old American woman with a 10-inch blade.
The bios of both men are fairly similar to the beheaders of British soldier Lee Rigby. The perpetrators were Nigerian converts to Islam. Alton Nolen was a black convert to Islam. They had a history of criminal behavior followed by a conversion to Islam and the inevitable bloody ending.
On his Facebook page, Nolen posted, “Sharia law is coming!!!” The killers of Lee Rigby had chanted for Sharia law in the streets of London. That is the same Sharia law of stonings and beheadings.
It is the law of the Koran which states, “When you meet the unbelievers in Jihad smite at their necks until you have slaughtered many of them.” (Koran 47:4)
Or as Nolen quoted after posting a gory beheading photo on his Facebook page, “Thus do we find the clear precedent that explains the peculiar penchant of Islamic terrorists to behead their victims: it is merely another precedent bestowed by their Prophet.”
The quote underneath the beheading photo backed that up, “I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off of them.”(Quran 8:9-13)
An unbeliever is anyone who isn’t a Muslim.
This latest “Nothing to do with Islam” atrocity follows the Islamic State’s beheading of two Americans. These acts were admired by an Oklahoma City nursing home worker who was arrested for threatening a female co-worker with an ISIS style beheading on account of her being a Christian.
Again, nothing to do with Islam. Much like the Islamic State beheadings which we have been told also have nothing to do with Islam.
This sort of “Nothing to do with Islam” beheading pops up now and again.
A decade ago Ariel Selloul was nearly decapitated in Texas by Mohammed Ali Alayed. Mo had recently gotten religion and become a devout Muslim. His victim was Jewish. Before Mohammed got serious about Islam, the two men had been friends.
Again, it had nothing to do with Islam. At least that’s what the authorities said.
Around the same time a Jewish disc jockey was murdered in Paris by a Muslim friend who announced, “I killed a Jew, I will go to paradise. Allah made me do it.”
The Muslim killer, Adel Amastaibou, had threatened a Rabbi and a pregnant Jewish woman before. Instead the authorities decided that he was mentally ill.
Nothing to do with Islam. Not a thing.
And so we have a rash of mysterious beheadings and vicious stabbings that we know nothing about except that they have nothing to do with Islam. The more they obviously seem to have something to do with Islam, the more it has to be denied that they had anything to do with Islam.
Alton and Adel, Mohammed, Mujahid and Ismail, the latter two being the Muslim names of the Lee Rigby killers, have nothing to do with Islam. Even the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam.
And yet Alton Nolen decided that beheading had quite a lot to do with Islam. All he had to do to figure that out was open a Koran. Expecting to convince Muslims to believe that the Koran has nothing to do with Islam will be even harder than convincing them that beheadings and the Islamic State have nothing to do with Islam.
You might as well argue that Islam has nothing to do with Islam.
The CVE programs under Barack Obama keep promising to counter the Islamic narrative on Twitter, but instead Twitter is full of ISIS Jihadists displaying severed heads as trophies and quoting the appropriate verses from the Koran.
Obama denounces ISIS as un-Islamic for beheading people while leading a coalition against them which includes Muslim countries that use beheading as an Islamic punishment. The Saudis recently beheaded a man accused of sorcery. What’s the difference between the Islamic State and the Saudis? They both have lots of oil, terrorists and a penchant for beheading people, but the Saudis have better public relations.
Maybe when the Islamic State starts funding chairs at Georgetown and UCLA, and donating to the Clinton Global Initiative, it’ll start getting better press.
The Saudis can’t possibly be un-Islamic because the establishment’s official definition of Islam comes from them. Even the idea of denying that the Islamic State is Islamic is a Saudi strategy. But if Alton Nolen is un-Islamic then ISIS is un-Islamic and if ISIS is un-Islamic then Saudi Arabia is un-Islamic. And then Islam, whose holy book contains numerous verses calling for the brutal murder of non-Muslims, must also be un-Islamic.
Perhaps then there really isn’t an Islam. Or rather there are two Islams.
One is the oriental Unitarianism of the Western imagination whose practitioners are liberals with prayer rugs. The other is a grim relentless Jihad of murderous men who chant the Koran while severing heads. This is the Islam of the Arabian imagination. It is not always what it is, but to them it is the purity of what it should be.
The convert to Islam rarely becomes a liberal with a prayer rug. To become devout is to become more certain, not less certain. And that certainty ends in Jihad. It ends in a murder commanded by Allah.
The real Islam’s symbols carry powerful meanings. The beheading is the final and ultimate meaning. By killing non-Muslims in the name of Allah, its followers become Allah, they gain the power of life and death, to kill and enslave, to rob and rape; they become the murderous masters of creation.
When they say that “Allah made me do it” what they really mean is that the part of them that wants to kill, to rob and rape, to burn and kidnap, made them do it. By submitting to Allah, the Muslim becomes Allah. When he kills, it is Allah killing. His religion is reducible to his will to kill. This is ISIS. This is Islam.
It has nothing to do with the imaginary Islam of the liberal. It has everything to do with the real Islam.
..................
If it wasn't terrorism or Islam, why isn't it a race crime?
Here’s one way the Left is playing it:
In the Oklahoma Beheader, Rightbloggers See U.S. Jihad, Counsel Pants-Wetting Fear
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2014/09/n_the_mad_muslim_of_moore_oklahoma_rightbloggers_see_us_jihad_counsel_fear.php
Money line: “What’s the difference between the Islamic State and the Saudis? They both have lots of oil, terrorists and a penchant for beheading people, but the Saudis have better public relations.”
Exactly. We just have to understand their culture
Where does Christianity call for the execution of those who won’t follow Jesus? I must have missed that part...
> “Here’s one way the Left is playing it:
In the Oklahoma Beheader, Rightbloggers See U.S. Jihad, Counsel Pants-Wetting Fear
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2014/09/n_the_mad_muslim_of_moore_oklahoma_rightbloggers_see_us_jihad_counsel_fear.php
Funny they should try to compare Christianity to Islam but I don’t see anything about Christianity that is nearly as violent or evil. You sure don’t see Christians beheading people who won’t bow to their religion and piling their heads up in the streets or in the back of pickups for photo ops then posting them online. You don’t see them crucifying people or taking their heads and putting them on pikes in the street for all to see. They don’t lock women and children in buildings then fire missiles from them so they enemy will fire back and kill them then contact the news media to make their enmy look bad. Christians don’t go into mosques and demand that the Muslims become Christians or they I’ll be enslaved, forced to pay a “tax” to “co-exist with them or rape and stone their women “in the name of G-d”.
So Mr. Leftist Blogger you are an idiot and all your points are moot.
I own 5 out of 7.
I find it interesting that now one of them defines their very faith as predominantly about murder.
Islam turns otherwise normal people into psychopathic killers. It deadens them to gruesome murder, as well as rape and slavery. After this war with Islam is over, we can never let anyone who fought on its side back into civil society. It won’t work. They must be put down like rabid dogs.
I own five of the seven, too. My Colt is an ugly old 1917 wheelgun in .45 ACP, hardball FMJ dipped in pig grease.
What we need are “Radicalized Infidels” who are ready to strike back at violent muzzies. OK?
BTW, “OK” now stands for “Obliterate Kaaba”.
I was waiting for Greenfield to weigh in on this... I'm not disappointed... Thanks for posting SJackson.
One is the oriental Unitarianism of the Western imagination whose practitioners are liberals with prayer rugs.
The other is a grim relentless Jihad of murderous men who chant the Koran while severing heads. This is the Islam of the Arabian imagination. It is not always what it is, but to them it is the purity of what it should be.
FYI
On the Tuesday before the OK horror, he wrote on his fb “the end is near.”
What a pity that the guy who stopped the beheader didn’t embrace the merits of the triple-tap.
Your point is well taken. There have, however been “disagreements” on what kind of Christianity. To wit, 2 examples of a long list:
The executions, or matanzas (Spanish word for slaughters) of Jean Ribault and the French Protestant Huguenots who were the last of the Fort Caroline, FL French colonists (admittedly they were coming from the Atlantic entrance to the river access to St. Augustine to attack the Castillo. Hit by a hurricane that destroyed the fleet, they washed ashore and were hunted down by the Spanish, who gave them a choice- convert to Catholicism or be killed—they were killed. This area now is called Matanzas Inlet.
Another prominent example is the St. Bartholomew’s day massacre in 1572 in which the wealthiest Calvinist French aristocracy, who came to a wedding of Charles IX’s daughter to Protestant Henry of Navarre who became Henry IV. Charle’s momma being Catherine de Medici—a plot was made to kill them all off, and it was done. Religious political mass murder. And it resounded all the way to Elizabeth I’s court in England.
There are many other religious slaughters (Armenian genocide by the Turks, including mostly Christians of all persuasions and Jews).
This is why, for the defense of all that is the United States of America, we must recognize the freedom of religion practiced within conscript of Law. And the unifying feature of these Mohammedans is the Koran which commands the murder of ALL infidels, for uh, religious (yeah right) reasons. It is a global war fought against us by the world govt islamofascists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.