I have a camera on mine and I don’t bother with other folks’ property.
I have mine, mostly, for landscape shots. I may use it with real-estate sales at some point. My pro step cost me about $3500 and while I am not a sue happy guy, I am not a bit bashful when it comes to the willful and deliberate destruction of my property.
I suspected as much. The article isn't clear if this was over the shooter's property.
I am not a bit bashful when it comes to the willful and deliberate destruction of my property.
As you should. Many of those against the camera drones are concerned with their private property rights.
I suspect we will have some more laws on this topic.
Fly that thing over my house and I’ll smash it with 1 7/16 oz of mag #4 shot going 1400 fps!