Replies

Which is why Texas and Wisconsin would be well within their rights, I would think, to enforce the voter ID laws as written, under the reasoning that said laws were held to be constitutional by a higher court. They could further assert that they viewed the most recent lower court decision to have been made by a "judge" who was ignorant of the ruling in the Supreme Court case.

By the time this lackwit judge gets it all sorted out, the election will be over, the votes counted and the matter will be resolved.

Picking and choosing which laws ( whether statutory, case or administrative) isn't just for Presidents, you know. The right to choose which laws we will obey and which we will ignore is for everybody in this great country. ;-)

I think that every precinct can demand ID for voting because all the classes for precinct employees and judges have already been printed and signed to by everyone administering, overseeing the vote, which starts Monday morning.

There isn’t enough time to re-train every precinct in Texas to adhere to this ruling. I think an emergency overturn should be tomorrow, but if not every election worker should require ID and say they have no legal advice on how to commence the election with this ruling.