[Hostage]

Since LGBTs, Obama and our secular courts seem hell bent on destroying the definition of marriage, it’s not a stretch to assume their real mission is to trash this prime teaching of the Church. If they’re bold enough to trash the Church, they most assuredly will have no reservations about trashing our precious constitution.

Yep.

It makes absolutely no sense why a minuscule percentage of the population gets to dictate how the rest of us live . . . until you consider that perhaps the LGBT leaders are nothing more than immoral zealots on a jihad to gain public approval of a behavior they themselves feel insecure about. So insecure in fact, they demand validation from others through the secular courts.

Yep again.

[Paisan]

a behavior they themselves feel insecure about. So insecure in fact, they demand validation from others

Well said...

[StonyBurk]

Rule of thumb —you generally get more of the behavior encouraged —and less of the behavior you punish -or encourage negatively. The problem as I see it is since the sixties revolution we have allowed the Courts to force social change in behavior that is not based upon any “greater good” but the social experiment -or the vain hope that one can force others to behave like robots and thereby control society—a greater good only for those controlling the sheep. problem is there will always be certain types who rebel against being forced to contradict what they know to be right, their right as dictated by God Himself —not by by government degcreee