[rktman]

WHAT!!!!!!! He was prohibited from possessing a weapon but somehow managed to have one anyway. They obviously need more laws in Canada to prevent these sorts of things from happening ever again.

[Da Coyote]

Yeah, riiiiight.

Muslim jihadis couldn’t possibly obtain guns should they want them in Canada.

Or the U.S.

Or in the U.K.

And Obama has a measurable I.Q. too.

[cripplecreek]

Somehow I don’t think concern about legalities was foremost in his thoughts.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

The idea of placing unarmed guards in military dress is preposterous. There is no point in having a disabled weapon.

[HammerT]

Wow! It’s almost like gun control laws only work on people who follow the law.

Go figure.

[bigbob]

In other words, law breakers don’t obey laws...do I have that right?

[Safetgiver]

Why did that poor soldier at the War Memorial not have ammunition in his rifle?”...Well, obviously, it was a Gun Free Zone, sheesh.

[556x45]

Speaking of guns...did anyone see the pic of this guy in the act? To me it looks like he brought a lever gun to the party.

[The KG9 Kid]

Does Canada have geostationary spy satellites that keep track of every barnyard double-barrel Pappy Yoakum scattergun in their nation?

Because that’s what this Jihadi used: An old side-by-side farm shotgun.

He MUST have gotten it from America. Nobody in Canada has high tech weaponry like that!

[tumblindice]

What? Sheik al-Sparkle had a gun, even though he was banned from having a gun? No! Fo shizzle! How can this be? Can you not see the consternation on our faces?

[bgill]

Bad guys always follow the rules, right?

[NewHampshireDuo]

I would imagine that the local mosque has a lending program for beheading knives, small arms, suicide belts, etc. No need to return the item if you have proof of martyrdom.

[dfwgator]

Boy he’s in real big trouble now.