[Kazan]

During Bush's first term, Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and the White House. And, as the author points out, nothing got done.

It's moronic contention. We got tax cuts. Far more conservative justices on the SCOTUS than under Obama or Clinton. We didn't get a government takeover of healthcare. We didn't ended up with gays in the military or troops being exposed to Ebola. Or open borders. Or a corrupted IRS. Or a President bypassing congress to enact amnesty for illegals.

It's absolutely IDIOTIC to claim there is no difference between the parties.

[SoConPubbie]

It's absolutely IDIOTIC to claim there is no difference between the parties.

And yet Bush:

1. Did every thing in his power to get Amnesty passed (A Nation killer).
2. Passed TARP famously stating: Bush: “I’ve abandoned free market principles to save the free market system”

[B4Ranch]

>>It’s absolutely IDIOTIC to claim there is no difference between the parties. <<

They are joined at the shoulder and the hip. The one and only difference between them is the path to take to get to their destination which is a One World Government. The Republicans don’t do anything about defeating the EPA or Agenda 21. They both want to bring in all the Mexican illegal aliens they possibly can. Neither party wants to build a fence on the border. Neither one did anything to stop the inflow of Muslims and their half dozen wives on welfare. Nobody does anything about taxes except raise them. There is no difference between the parties.