Michigan legislative action thread
He shouldn’t have run from the paternity case but two wrongs do not make a right. This is not fair.
Then they should go talk to the blury lady in green.
it was not his kid, he was in jail and the process server did a sewer service..
Guy has a rock solid alibi. How many of us could come up with that from 20 years ago?
If they want to put me in jail - I mean I don’t owe support for a child that I know isn’t mine.
Most people just go along with what the system wants.
This man should tell the system to go screw itself.
Isn’t there a TV station willing to interview this guy and call the judge out for being an IDIOT?
In most states, if the court orders it, you are stuck, no ands, ifs, or buts. And, to top it off, you have no right to the child as they will argue it isn’t yours.
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/can-you-get-a-refund-if-the-child-you-support-isnt-really-yours
If ever there was a reason to abstain until marriage, this is it.
Time to find a lawyer that will work pro-bono and 1) Sue the process server and the company he worked for 2) Sue the mother for Fraud 3) appeal the decision and take it to a higher court. Surely a good lawyer could make some money out of this!
Typical Democrat / Liberal War on Men.
Can the governor issue a pardon on something like this in Michigan? It shouldn’t require that but it appears the judge is being absurd - a reasonable judge could look at this situation and just dismiss it on the court’s own motion.
Prosecute the process server.
From the article...
The court focused on a summons tied to the paternity case in the late 1980’s. The state sent a process server to Alexander’s dad’s house in Highland Park to let him know about the paternity case. The process server turned a document into the court saying Alexander was delivered the summons, but he refused to sign the summons.
“I wasn’t there. I couldn’t refuse to sign,” said Alexander.
An Evidenciary hearing or something similar must be petitioned for. The Accused must be allowed to confront the witness against him. Simply citing a document isn’t sufficient. In this case the process server who submitted a falsified document in a legal proceeding claiming to have served the Accused. As the Accused was in custody, the Server might be up on charges for submitting falsified documents. The statute of limitations won’t run until knowledge of the falsificaton is reasonably discovered. That would be now.
(1) incompetent judge should be removed from the bench.
(2) the woman that put him down as the father should be locked up for welfare fraud and required to pay the $30,000.
(3) the guy should be able to sue the state. It wouldn’t set very well with me if I had been wrongly imprisoned.
Helen Smith discusses this in Men on Strike.