Posted on 11/05/2014 3:58:55 AM PST by Wolfie
Alaska Becomes Fourth State To Legalize Recreational Marijuana
In yet another major pushback against the war on drugs, Alaska legalized recreational marijuana joining Oregon and Washington, D.C. -- both of which legalized cannabis only hours before on election day.
Alaska becomes the fourth state in the U.S. to legalize retail marijuana, along with Oregon, Colorado and Washington state.
Voters approved Measure 2, which legalizes the possession, use and sale of recreational marijuana. Adults, age 21 and older, may possess up to 1 ounce of marijuana and grow up to six plants (with no more than three being mature) for personal use. The measure also legalizes the manufacture, sale and possession of marijuana paraphernalia, such as devices used for smoking or storing the plant.
Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, said in a statement early Wednesday morning: “The folks trying to keep marijuana illegal are relying on the same scare tactics today that they have relied on for decades, but voters just aren’t falling for it anymore. The results are particularly encouraging since voter turnout during a midterm election is typically smaller, older, and more conservative. Clearly, support for ending marijuana prohibition spans the political and ideological spectrums."
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
Didn’t pass in Florida, though; so it’s not a wave of pot acceptance.
It’s a religion for some of the supporters.
Good. Now the “personal libertarians” can get legally stoned and be too high to vote in future elections with their distorted thinking.
You should get over yourself. Spice is way, way, way, way, way, way, way, more dangerous.
Ha. Maybe that is part of the formula. Gardner did out perform in Colorado! Didn't Washington state get a new GOP State Senate, too?
Hmmm. In a state where there are many bush / floatplane pilots.
Is the price of legal MJ now cheaper than illegal MJ in Colorado?
It was also supposed to get “Good-time” Charlie Crist elected in Florida—The assumption being that people who voted for Amendment 2 would also vote for Charlie (and vice-versa).
Happily, both went down.
It’s already legal for personal cultivation and use under the State’s Constitution (Ravin v. State). This really just legalizes commercial sales.
Florida needed 60% to pass a constitutional amendment. They got 57%. That’s pretty darn close.
And, for many people, this isn’t about pot acceptance. This is about pushing back the failed War on Drugs and accepting personal liberty.
We need to stop treating users like criminals and treat this as a public health issue. Put the money that we’re spending on the WOD into humane rehabilitation.
Right now, in Texas, it’s easier for kids to get a hold of meth or pot than it is for them to get beer.
We’re doing something very wrong.
“We need to stop treating users like criminals and treat this as a public health issue. “
We need to prosecute them for the crimes they commit and stop the plea-down dealing to mj offenses.
In Saudi Arabia, they behead druggies. Behead them.
They are NOT soft on crime and yet they never run out of people to behead.
We have more people in prison, per capita, than ANY other country on earth. More than China. More than Cuba. More than North freaking Korea.
How the heck are we soft on drug crimes?
We are *paying* for this. We pay to maintain our Goliath prison system. We all personally pay with the loss of liberty and the anti-American practice of Civil Forfeiture. We pay for the prisoners released who then have a lifetime of not being able to find gainful employment. We pay in loss of life of our children.
We have NO CONTROL over the drug trade.
And we will never stop it.
Again, in Saudi Arabia, they chop off the heads of drug dealers, yet they never run out of drug dealers.
Florida was just for medical marijuana, not recreational. I was surprised it didn’t pass.
I see from your post that you are a frequent visitor to the pro-drug sites.
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
It is a Leftist idea to support their failures with, “This isn’t working. We must do *more* of it!”
We are not Leftists. We are smarter than that. We can see that a tactic isn’t working, reevaluate, look at history and change our approach.
I am not a Leftist and I can see that the WOD isn’t working. We’re not getting the results that we want. It’s time to try something else and undo the damage that the WOD has caused our society.
Make no mistake, it’s the War on Drugs that’s caused more damage than the drugs themselves.
The vote here in FL was 58-42 for "medical" marijuana. It didn't pass because the threshold necessary was 60%, but it will happen, because the supporters won't quit until it happens.
(Full disclosure: I was part of the 42%, and my county had a majority against the measure.)
I’m a frequent visitor to FR, not pro-drug sites. The only anti-WOD site that I visit regularly is LEAP. (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition)
It’s here at FR that I saw the loss of our civil liberties at the hands of the Drug Warriors. It’s here that I realized that I, a drug warrior, was part of the problem.
I am not ‘pro-drug’. I am anti-WOD. I am pro-regulation. I am pro-rehabilitation. I am pro-Constitution. I am anti-Civil Forfeiture.
I am many things, but I am not pro-drug. And, no - I don’t hang out with stoners.
The WOD is just a symptom. The problem is the unconstitutional abuse of the Commerce Clause that has usurped state powers and handed them over to unelected bureaucrats in the DC.
The majority opinion correctly applies our decision in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and I join it in full. I write separately only to express my view that the very notion of a “substantial effects” test under the Commerce Clause is inconsistent with the original understanding of Congress’ powers and with this Court’s early Commerce Clause cases. By continuing to apply this rootless and malleable standard, however circumscribed, the Court has encouraged the Federal Government to persist in its view that the Commerce Clause has virtually no limits. Until this Court replaces its existing Commerce Clause jurisprudence with a standard more consistent with the original understanding, we will continue to see Congress appropriating state police powers under the guise of regulating commerce. - Justice Clarence Thomas
“The only anti-WOD site that I visit regularly is LEAP. “
LEAP wants our drug policies to be decided by the U.N.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.