Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnnyP

But he admitted that on national tv, said they held votes back. Shouldn’t that have some kind of consequence?


21 posted on 11/05/2014 7:58:45 PM PST by Kenny (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: gr8eman

ping

From thread here
Watch Faifax County, VA, to see how the Democrats steal elections!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3223239/posts?page=11#11

and

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3223239/posts?page=63#63


23 posted on 11/05/2014 8:14:01 PM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny
Consequences? For a liberal admitting something?

Look how little happened to Melowese that admitted to a felony! You know that animal voted in this last election though being a felon should have banned her...................

26 posted on 11/05/2014 9:06:12 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny

Holding back (no quotes) votes is not the same as creating enough votes to win.

You could probably get away with holding back votes if you have more real ones than you need. That would be like sandbagging in a poker game.

But I don’t think that’s what Beckel was talking about. “Holding back” may be a euphemism for manufacturing enough to win.


29 posted on 11/05/2014 11:22:35 PM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson