Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
2 posted on
11/08/2014 9:04:02 AM PST by
EBH
(And the angel poured out his cup...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Uneaten food is not nutritional. If nutrition was all that mattered, we’d eat astronaut food and vitamin pills.
3 posted on
11/08/2014 9:04:22 AM PST by
Bryanw92
(Sic semper tyrannis)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
And they know what these kids are eating how?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Cut the entire government by 1/3.
5 posted on
11/08/2014 9:04:48 AM PST by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I have no doubt that most parents could be feeding their children in a more healthy manner. But nothing is more unhealthy and deadly than government force. In the end we will all be a lot healthier if the government backs off.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What matters the most is who gets to decide which lunch the children eat.
I say the parents should.
Those who think it is the governments decision to make, for the safety of our children, they should be thrown off a high cliff into the sea.
7 posted on
11/08/2014 9:05:52 AM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Since there is no single “packed lunch”, shouldn’t it read that packed lunches ‘sometimes’, or ‘can be’, or ‘frequently’, or ‘often ‘ are nutritionally inferior to?
10 posted on
11/08/2014 9:08:45 AM PST by
ansel12
(The churlish behavior of Obama over the next two years is going to be spellbinding.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I grew up eating a packed lunch, and yet I somehow managed to survive. Go figure.
11 posted on
11/08/2014 9:10:48 AM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Just a reminder that, when it comes to children, government knows best.
Fairly soon there will be trial balloon stories about how the government needs to inspect breakfast and dinner......for the children of course.
12 posted on
11/08/2014 9:11:10 AM PST by
lacrew
To: Oldeconomybuyer
In high school, I would go to the school store and buy a pack of Starbursts. Pretty much every day, that was all I ate. Guess what, 25 years later- I am stll here. Still healthy. Still thin. Don’t have diabetes, etc.
13 posted on
11/08/2014 9:11:18 AM PST by
riri
(Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Based on this, how did we survive? /ridicule /sarc
17 posted on
11/08/2014 9:14:48 AM PST by
SandRat
(<Duty - Hon/sarcor - Country! What else needs sGoog evening Lauren... aid?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let the chef decide what the kids like to eat. The Principal can step in if it's blatantly unhealthy. This bizarre central planning by the President's wife and Washington bureaucrats is unacceptable.
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
20 posted on
11/08/2014 9:18:05 AM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ooookkkkaaaay, Government study to determine if government programs i.e. lunches at school are more nutritious than what mom packs. Conclusion, mommy knows nothing about the eating habits of their kids....conclusion technocrat knows wha't best for your child better than you....conclusion, parents are harming their children by not adhering to government initiatives, conclusion, parents are now required to submit to government program or risk punitive damages. Conclusion, parents are now required to submit to Child Protective Services menues offered to their kids. Conclusion, Governments will now require all parents submit inventory in cupboards and fridge to see if they are following government dictates. Conclusion, government will require 200,000 new nutrition and enforcement specialists to mandate the success of the new lunch program...Obama will tout the initiative as a success in creating new jobs for the economy and provide a healthy lunch menu for millions of malnourished children across the country. Republicans will be accused of obstruction and starting a war on children by not voting for the bill
Welcome to the abc's of tyranny!
21 posted on
11/08/2014 9:18:13 AM PST by
bubman
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What a stupid premise. So EVERY packed lunch, all of them; whether it is parboiled tree-bark or a hard boiled egg, is less nutritious than school lunches, any of them. Only a complete fool would make such a statement.
23 posted on
11/08/2014 9:19:16 AM PST by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The research team, led by Alisha R. Farris of the Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Exercise at Virginia Tech ... Would anybody care to wager against me as to the source of funding of this study being from a government grant? Possibilities are almost endless as to a specific source but none-the-less it does put a place-holder in the concept that parents are dangerous to their children, does it not? Taking this concept to its logical conclusion would probably result in bag lunches being banned and lunch room monitors forcing the students to eat their 'healthy' school lunches! Paging the current FLOTUS and overflowing waste cans at schools everywhere!
27 posted on
11/08/2014 9:22:52 AM PST by
SES1066
(Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I guess we can’t do anything at all anymore without instructions from the government. How did those of us born before 1980 survive?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Fresh out of the Journal of Pure and Applied Medical Propaganda.
35 posted on
11/08/2014 9:30:18 AM PST by
SpaceBar
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"I approve this study! Now, gimme my 5%!"
36 posted on
11/08/2014 9:31:14 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson