When this last happened at the height of the cold war in 1985, it followed a visit by then Vice President George H. W. Bush to Saudi Arabia. Bush convinced the Saudi royal family it was in their best interest to reduce the price of crude oil to regain market share. As a beneficial side effect, Russia would lose a major source of foreign exchange. This followed a major investment by Russia in radar capability, which was largely negated by the publicity of the US then recently developed stealth technology. With reduced foreign exchange, Russia was unable to replicate the stealth technology and the Soviet Union failed. Unfortunately, the economies of the oil producing states, Texas among the most extreme example, were crippled.
This time around, Obama has visited Saudi Arabia twice this year, Bidden has called the Saudi royal family once and the UAE twice. This time it appears the primary objective is to cripple the oil producing states economies, principally Texas, which have been a thorn in Obama’s side. The beneficial side effects of reducing Russia’s foreign exchange, increasing Saudi market share, and reducing the foreign exchange of Iran, along with the positive effect on the economies of states more aligned with Obama, are perhaps just that, side effects.
By the way, crude prices dropped from a intra day high of about $32 in 1985 to a intra day low of $8 in 1986. That is a 75% drop. Prices did not return to $32 on a sustained basis until 2003.
I don’t think the Saudis will be able to defeat the technology of fracked wells.
Once they’re in operation, there’s no disincentive to production.
Really low prices might deter more exploration and drilling, but not existing production.
I rhetorically asked in a prior thread, “Who benefits from this crash?”
Hmmmm....
Needs to go back down to $1.09 a gallon for premium first.
The big news is the extra dollars consumers have in their pockets from lower gas prices.
Bloodbath??? No, Blessing.