There’s no there there.
Except to liberals upset the justice system didn’t railroad an innocent onto death row.
But they want the Feds to second-guess St. Louis Grand Jurors.
Never mind the evidence overwhelmingly favored Darren Wilson’s innocence.
In spite of that he was forced out of his job. And some people still won’t take “no” for an answer.
Rudy Guiliani is right - the evidence is incontrovertible save to those who refuse to look at it.
It is a democrat special form of mathematics.
AlGoreithm
Any method of calculation performed repeatedly until a desired result is produced.
While Guiliani’s statement was welcome as he addressed the problem as a former prosecutor would. Crediting Holder as legitimately viewing prosecution when in his heart Rudy truly knows Holder wants a show trial. And should have said so.
Correct. Some of these people need to be prosecuted for perjury; even those liars who said he was surrendering with his hands up. The Holder DoJ is infamous for cases with perjury. Happens all the time in their DC court.
I wonder if Rudy is familiar with the saying "snitches get stitches" and what the attitude behind that phrase might mean to a jury made up substantially of blacks and other minorities.
Think the king, King Obama, the communists BLACK Muslim traitor, or Holder, the black criminal, give a shi!? The have some of the testimony changed by now. Never estimate the power of criminals we have in the Whorehouse. Whoops meant Whitehouse.
Intimidation by Holder should be a major issue. He’s on his way out but will do as much damage as he can before packing his tutu and loin cloths for retirement in a primitive African village where he will be in his natural habitat.
I understand and appreciate what Giuliani is doing here, but he knows he's wrong on this point. Holder is more than capable of cherry-picking the right stuff (and leaving out the rest) from the evidence to convince a grand jury to indict.
And that's Holder's main objective right now - a federal indictment stirs the pot again, both keeping the issue alive in the first place as well as the subtext of why the local grand jury didn't indict.
Then, on the inevitable acquittal, a third round of pot stirring occurs because the "murderer" someone managed to "walk" because of some nefarious "white privilege".
The script has already been written, it's just a matter of watching it all play out, now.