Clinton: Including Women Essential to Peace Processes - Launches National Action Plan Academy
..”Jackie is a lovely person who never sought and who thoroughly disdains publicity or sensation,” Chase said. “She spoke in good faith, and she deserves respect.”
She added that regardless of whether there were incorrect details in the student’s account, “We don’t need Jackie’s story to substantiate the problem of rape on this, or any other campus.”..
“WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?!!”
The advocates, however, do not have any fears about destroying the reputations of an entire fraternity and defaming the university.
This year there were over 3000 rapes reported in the military this year . . . . by men.
I can’t wait to read about that in Rolling Stone.
In bizzaro-world, I’d be the judge presiding over the BMF of a libel case the Phi Psi’s will no-doubt bring on RS.
As part of the settlement, I’d order them to write a story, no shorter than 10 full pages, upon which pages no advertising or pictures numbering more than 1 per page of no more than 3 inches square, about male on male rape in the US military.
For not fact checking before going to print, I would hand the keys to the office to Phi Psi, and let them dedicate the entire rag to Jefferson.
There must be another victim campaign in the works, maybe to link up with the Fergusson bunch ( and the commies, rats, racists, and jihadi recruiters tied in with that).
I'm sure the Potemkin papers will all praise her glorious deeds.
Advocates fear impact of Rolling Stone apologyRolling Bull believed it to be true because the sick minded perverts and readers of that garbage enjoyed believing it was true.
Nobody has to worry about the rest of us.
If my 24 year old daughter and her friends are any indication, young people see Rolling Stone like Levi jeans, hippies and Hillary Clinton: too 20th century.
RS keeps sending her free copies, hoping she’ll subscribe but they go unread into the recycling tub. It should join Look, Time, Dan Rather and Newsweak before too very long.
If I were a victim of sexual assault, I’d be more concerned with the fact that falsified stories undermine the impact and validity of assaults that actually occurred. Accusing innocent people of violent crime is unacceptable and should not be condoned or endorsed for any reason.
If that were true, you'd think they would have had no problem finding a genuine story.
Quoth Rush:
“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”
Even back then I was struck by their play on the NYT slogan by adjusting it to "All the News that Fits". Even as a young naïve kid, I realized that meant journalistic quality and accuracy apparently was not at the top of their list.
Funny how that now also applies to the NYT too. I can remember way back also that the NYT was rightfully called the newspaper of record.
A hoax you say?
“Our trust in her was misplaced,” the magazine’s editor, Will Dana, wrote in a signed apology.”
“Trust but verify,” Genius.
Sounds more and more like a premeditated hate crime against Phi Kappa Psi.
Just like that Bitch, Lena Dunham, who tried to smear Republicans by making up a story about being raped by a College Republican.
If that was the case, there wouldn't be a need to fabricate any.