Posted on 12/08/2014 10:10:21 AM PST by Kaslin
The House has finally approved recognition to the victims of the 2009 Islamic terror attack at Ft. Hood. The Senate may pass the legislation this week. However, lingering questions remain.
In June 2009 Islamic terrorist Major Nadal Hassan, a member of the U.S. military who had been promoted despite poor performance reviews and troubling sympathies to Islamic terrorism, opened fire on his fellow service members at Ft. Hood, Texas. Islamic terrorist Hassan killed 13 soldiers and wounded 32 others while screaming “Allahu Akbar! (God is Great!)”
Survivors of the attack, wounded and non-wounded, along with a majority of the American people, believe that these soldiers died just as their comrades did on September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon; because of Islamic terrorism.
The current administration classified the terrorist attacks, in politically correct Orwellian terms, as “workplace violence.”
Three defense secretaries, Robert Gates, Leon Pannetta, and Chuck Hagel refused to change that designation.
In an interview with Townhall.com, COL (ret) Kathy Platoni, an Army psychologist who survived the attack and has been a tireless advocate for the Purple Heart recognition for the survivors, said those who lived through the attack have suffered long enough and that “What this administration has not done in classifying this terrorist attack as what it was has led to even further suffering by the victims and their families.”
According to Dr. Platoni, survivors of the attack have spent many thousands of dollars on medical bills. Platoni’s assertion is confirmed by Congressman Roger Williams of Texas. Williams said the survivors of the attack had collectively spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide their own health care as victims lost their military health insurance and other benefits that would have been afforded to any wounded warrior in combat.
Congressman Williams cited the case of Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford, who was wounded seven times by Hassan, as one particularly egregious example of the administration’s failure to recognize the wounded. Lunsford was denied entry “into an army post-traumatic stress disorder clinic because he was not injured in combat” as reported by Susan Crabtree in The Washington Examiner.
Language was recently inserted by the House of Representatives in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which will make the Ft. Hood victims, and quite possibly other military victims of domestic terrorism, eligible for the Purple Heart. The Military Times reported that the language will award Purple Heart eligibility to “members of the armed forces killed or wounded in domestic attacks inspired by foreign terrorist organizations.”
The NDAA is up for passage in the U.S. Senate this week and victims are hopeful that the Ft. Hood language remains. Still, the survivors and families of the victims have several lingering questions to this tragedy:
1-Why was Hassan promoted despite negative performance reviews? Worse, why was he allowed to remain in the military despite his possible terrorist sympathies? Could it have been political correctness?
2-If the NDAA with the Ft. Hood amendment passes, why did it take over five years to get the recognition, and more importantly, the treatment our heroes needed from the administration? Hundreds of thousands of dollars, and countless hours of pain and suffering, could have been alleviated by the stroke of a pen.
3-Why did the previous stand alone act, the Fort Hood Heroes Act, die in committee which led to the “backdoor” NDAA language insertion?
4-Purple Hearts were awarded for casualties at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Why was there a different standard for that day in 2001 and not the later Ft Hood attacks? Is it the politics of different administrations? Or is it because the nation’s leaders seem to have little understanding of the conflict we are in; a generations long conflict similar to many previous wars we have fought (the Revolution, the Philippine Insurrection, Viet Nam). This conflict is multi-dimensional and no one is immune, as September 11, 2001, Fort Hood, ISIS, and countless other Islamic terror attacks inside the United States have shown. Our soldiers will continue to die at abroad and even at home.
Hopefully this recognition and treatment serves our heroes better. And hopefully it helps wake up our leaders to the long struggle against Islamic terrorism that we will continue to face as a people.
Obama signing the legislation is doubtful as it would be an admission that his beloved isslime isn’t a religion of peace. Screw the Army service members...
Obama insisted this terrible event was categorized as “workplace violence”. Even when the Islamist militant that did the act of terrorism said he was on a Jihad and was a warrior for Islam. The Islamic terrorist was screaming allah akbar as he was killing the U.S. soldiers who were forbidden from carrying weapons. Such is the pure evil of Barack Obama.
Someone please correct me if I’m wrong, but my impression is that anyone wounded by an enemy combatant gets a purple heart.
These service people are long overdue.
I don't see how.
The 'rules' do not seem to include what happened at Fort Hood.
Eligibility criteria for the Purple Heart Medal is as follows:
a. The Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United States to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed, or who has died or may hereafter die after being wounded
(1) In any action against an enemy of the United States.
(2) In any action with an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States are or have been engaged.
(3) While serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.
(4) As a result of an act of any such enemy of opposing armed forces.
(5) As the result of an act of any hostile foreign force.
(6) After 28 March 1973, as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States or a foreign nation friendly to the United States, recognized as such an attack by the Secretary of the Army, or jointly by the Secretaries of the separate armed Services concerned if persons from more than one service are wounded in the attack.
(7) After 28 March 1973, as a result of military operations while serving outside the territory of the United States as part of a peacekeeping force.
b. While clearly an individual decoration, the Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for the decoration; rather he or she is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.