This confuses me.
I have seen post after post on FR calling for Obummer’s arrest, conviction, and hanging and/or being put in front of a firing squad. I have also seen posts calling him a ‘lying Kenyan traitor”, not to mention a homosexual, a Muslim, a communist, and a “piece of s##t”.
Yet, when people are out in front of the White House saying things that many on FR have already openly said in a public forum, we condemn them?
Somebody explain this to me.
You probably won’t get an answer. I’m not sure why there is a need to refute claims that the protesters uttered words which reflect the thoughts of most conservatives on this site. I really believe something has changed on FR over the past year or so, but cannot put my finger on it.
I have seen post after post on FR calling for Obummer’s arrest, conviction, and hanging and/or being put in front of a firing squad. I have also seen posts calling him a ‘lying Kenyan traitor”, not to mention a homosexual, a Muslim, a communist, and a “piece of s##t”.
Yet, when people are out in front of the White House saying things that many on FR have already openly said in a public forum, we condemn them?
Somebody explain this to me.
Did you read the article. These people are talking about hanging and ropes, yes, I (not we) condemned it. I have expressed opinions regarding his marxist policies and muslim sympathies. Bigoted comments are out of line.
Hope that clears up the confusion.
You’re correct , it’s hard to understand.
A prayer meeting is more in line with Tea partiers.
I’ll explain it from my perspective. Yes, we may think these things privately or speak of them among ourselves online, but most Tea Party folks are smart enough not to act that way in public, because such actions and words from us would be used to devalue our more substantial concerns.
Our more substantial concerns being to reduce the encroachment of government into our private and professional lives. Most conservatives place a lot of value in proper decorum while in public. Thats’ why you see us picking up trash after our demonstrations. That’s why you don’t hear us using profanity nearly as fluently as most libs. We try to articulate our point of view by using reason while in public. In private, yes, many of us do believe these concepts about Obama and far worse than what’s listed here.
We usually know how to compartmentalize better than Libs, who eat, sleep breathe and do all but fuel their cars on the strength of emotion.
That they called him ‘the Kenyan’ also sounds like infiltrators, to me. They’ve been reading FR or something, picked up some lingo so as to blend in. (They want to be US so bad!!!)
makes no sense to me either
It’s obvious you don’t pay attention when you read.