Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txnativegop
 

Not federal but at the state level there are such statutes.

He could also run afoul of any CCW laws that apply to the area.

Any such statue would, of necessity be extraordinarily vague. Any lawyer that would allow his client to be convicted under such a statue should be disbarred. I'd still be interested in any specifics that you might know of. I would have to wonder where the 'Hello Kitty AR-15' would fall under such a law.


18 posted on 12/15/2014 9:59:15 AM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: zeugma

I do not trust any official elected to office to “faithfully uphold the Constitution” as they are sworn to do.
It is public opinion that drives them, not the letter of the law.

As for the Hello Kitty AR it would get special treatment: most likely Patriot Act - Terrorism. Although exactly who would be terrorized is debatable.


19 posted on 12/15/2014 10:13:29 AM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson