Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nothing Succeeds Like Liberal Secession: Blue America Without Red America Would Be A Basket Case
Townhall.com ^ | December 15, 2014 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 12/15/2014 4:03:01 AM PST by Kaslin

The July 4, 2019, ceremony marking the final dissolution of the United States of America was quite amicable compared to the anger and bitterness of the preceding five years. The 2014 election results created a map clearly defining “Red America” and “Blue America,” and it sparked a debate, unlike any in the last 150 years, over whether the United States should remain united. For many in the leftist coastal states – their progressivism constrained by the overwhelming Congressional advantage of the conservative interior states – the answer was, “No.”

As liberal thought leader Michael Tomasky wrote of the South, “Practically the whole region has rejected nearly everything that’s good about this country and has become just one big nuclear waste site of choleric, and extremely racialized, resentment…. Forget about the whole fetid place. Write it off. Let the GOP have it and run it and turn it into Free-Market Jesus Paradise. The Democrats don’t need it anyway.”

Soon, it became an article of faith within the liberal elite that it was not only their party that did not need the rest of America. Blue America itself, they argued, did not need Red America, economically, intellectually or morally. It was not long until newly-elected Governor De Blasio of New York demanded a national convention to discuss a parting of the ways. The President, her health poor and her heart firmly with the Blue America, half-heartedly tried to stop the movement, but more and more high profile Democrat politicians joined the chorus. The President yielded and called for a “national conversation on the way forward as separate nations.” Red America, furious at her continuation of Barack Obama’s rule by decree and interference in its affairs, agreed to attend.

Two years later, President De Blasio, elected leader of the Democratic States of North America, and President Abbott of the Republic of America, stood together on the platform on the border at St. Louis to sign the Dissolution Pact. The countries split the national debt and apportioned federal assets, while agreeing to temporarily share the currency. They divided the military (along with all nuclear capabilities), but signed a mutual defense agreement. There would be free travel between and through the new nations. “We will remain good neighbors,” President De Blasio remarked, “Even if we are no longer brothers, sisters, or differently-gendered siblings.” President Abbott politely maintained a poker face.

Of course, back home in the Blue America’s capital, New York City, President De Blasio was less charitable. “We are no longer held back by the reactionary, racist policies of the past,” he thundered. “Together, we will build a new dawn of progress that places people before profits and promotes peace instead of perpetual war!” Blue America – New England and the mid-Atlantic seaboard, back through Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, the West Coast and Hawaii, immediately set to drafting a new constitution. It featured 216 new affirmative rights, including “the right to a living wage,” “the right to abortion upon demand at government expense,” and “the right to define one’s own life experience in terms of race and gender.” Embarrassingly, the rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion did not make the leaked initial draft; they were hastily added, but there was no right to keep and bear arms. In fact, the first law the new People’s Assembly passed was to confiscate all privately-owned weapons. The second was to legalize all illegal aliens, and the third to triple welfare payments.

Red America reaffirmed the United States Constitution. Then the Congress began a review of all existing laws, statutes and regulations, repealing thousands of them. It also limited social spending dramatically, making known the expectation that able-bodied adults would support themselves and their families. The resulting non-military federal government in Blue America was about one quarter the size of Red America’s.

The world was unsure how to deal with the new reality. The international elite and its lapdog media quickly took to portraying Red America with the same kind of venom as Blue American liberals. President De Blasio was taped at a private confab at the United Nations – which remained in New York – telling the foreigners that Blue America, “feels a greater kinship to our progressive friends in Europe than those redneck, racist, Jesus freaks next door.”

Red America stopped paying its UN dues and sent John Bolton to be its ambassador. After Israel, Red America became the most investigated and censured of any UN member state.

Blue America had little use for the military it inherited. Though the Pact had stipulated that both new nations would maintain a certain level of combat readiness, in Blue America the services were first in line to be cut. Forced to meet America’s defense needs alone, Red America slashed non-military spending and instituted two years of mandatory military service for every citizen as the only way to meet the need for manpower.

Many left Red America, some to avoid the draft and a larger number to collect the enhanced welfare benefits Blue America was giving away. Yet, many more came in from Blue America. By casting off useless regulations and cutting taxes (Blue America’s “Fair Share Act” increased the top income tax rate to 74.5% on earnings over $250,000), Red America unleashed a whirlwind of economic activity. Red America, already prosperous, grew even richer.

Fracking was outlawed in Blue America; Red America became the world’s number one petroleum exporter. Blue America laws banning nuclear and coal power led to the “Kentucky Line” of coal plants running parallel the state’s northern border with Blue Ohio, selling Blue America the power it refused to generate itself. The ban on GMO crops and many pesticides cratered Blue American food production, a void Red American farmers were happy to fill. All the while, Denver, Dallas, Atlanta and other cities grew their own tech and entertainment industries built on refugees from Silicon Valley and Hollywood looking for an environment where success was not penalized. Red America began to supply itself with what Blue America used to provide.

Blue America’s deficit exploded even as Red America balanced its budget, per the one new amendment it had added to the Constitution. But Red America’s budget was strained when the nation had to send its military to support Israel after the Jewish state came under massive attack for destroying Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Blue America not only refused to assist, but refused to let Red forces use its bases or ports. The rumors that Red American pilots in B-2 bombers and F-22 fighters flew many of the original anti-nuke missions over Iran alongside the Israeli Air Force were never confirmed.

With its economy slowing to a standstill, and riots erupting in Chicago and Philadelphia, the liberal ruling elite found itself a convenient scapegoat for Blue America’s woes – its neighbor. “Red plants pollute our skies, Red corporations exploit the land, and Red bankers steal our wealth!” Vice President Warren charged. “We need to fight back against the Red wreckers!”

The middle class and job creators were abandoning Blue America for opportunities in Red America, and they were taking their money with them. Hundreds of billions of dollars flowed out of Blue America into its neighbor. Frustrated by Red America’s refusal to provide banking information on these “tax cheats” – or to allow Red tax officials to collect unpaid taxes deposited in Red banks – Blue America breached the Dissolution Pact by outlawing the free transit of people and currency into Red America.

Red America was hardly blind – it saw the trends long before Blue America would admit to itself that it was headed toward disaster. Red America expected the migration and had already ensured that Blue newcomers would not be allowed to vote into effect the same liberal policies they had abandoned by requiring all aspiring citizens to serve their military obligation before being allowed a ballot. Few did, and the “Heinlein Act” succeeded by ensuring that every voting Red American citizen had “skin in the game.”

When Blue America broke the Pact by securing the internal borders and barring its citizens’ exit, Red America acted – quietly. Within 24 hours, its forces were manning the border too, turning back every truck and train carrying food or fuel into Blue America. At the same time, every power station feeding Blue America went offline. Then Red America waited.

It took 12 days, seven less than President Abbott’s National Security Council had estimated, before President De Blasio used the hotline to call and cave. There had been a lot of talk in the New York Times and other Blue media about surviving on “alternative power” and “utilizing green growing techniques in urban spaces” to meet the country’s energy and food needs. But it was early November, and it was cold. The grocery store shelves went bare with terrifying speed. The limousine liberals would always be warm, well-fed and safe in their gated communities, but no one else would be. The lie that was the liberal promise was there for all to see.

“Sure, Mr. President, we can talk about going back to how it was,” President Abbott said gently. “You’ll be honoring our deal from here on, right? Good. Oh, and I’m going to need you to do one more thing for me. No, it’s nothing too big. Just an apology. By you, on live television, with no hedging, about how sorry you and your friends are for those unkind things you said over the years about us redneck, racist, Jesus freaks who feed you, fuel you and keep your sorry asses safe. Oh, I’m serious as a heart attack. Well, I’ll look forward to watching it. Good-bye now, and God bless y’all.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: america; gop; liberal; schlichter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Kaslin
Blue America is shrinking in area, and if we could expel them from the union, Red America could remain free. I'm for expulsion rather than secession - it leaves less excuse for liberal parasites to turn the separation into a war.


61 posted on 12/15/2014 9:31:53 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Without the evil, awful, regressive red-necks racists in the red states, the entire world view of the “progressives” falls apart ... Without “oppressors”, there are no “oppressed”, and without the “oppressed” there can be no Gruberian progressive “Champions of the Oppressed” (to lie and ‘divide and conquer’ their way into power) ...


62 posted on 12/15/2014 9:51:44 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Those figures assumes dept of agriculture bennies to farmers are support for rural areas when in fact these are to lower food prices so they affect the cities but are paid rurally. The farmers wouldn’t starve without these price supports but the cities would.


63 posted on 12/15/2014 10:03:07 AM PST by When do we get liberated? (A socialist is a communist who realizes he must suck at the tit of Capitalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

Welfare for giant agricultural corporations.


64 posted on 12/15/2014 10:09:19 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Just draw a radius around all the major cities?


65 posted on 12/15/2014 10:15:16 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What a beautiful dream!


66 posted on 12/15/2014 10:36:30 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen
I believe some parts of blue states would ask red American if they could join...the small towns of New England for instance...

Therein lies the problem. 'Democrat' America exists almost entirely in the large cities. If the Good Lord would lob some strategically placed asteroids at the 10 largest cities in the country, the democrat party would, for all practical purposes, cease to exist.

67 posted on 12/15/2014 11:05:05 AM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bkmk


68 posted on 12/15/2014 12:55:30 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Originally, they had somewhat similar problems with “loyalists” and those that would easily shirk their responsibility.

The solution was that one’s vote only came through property ownership. Of course it did not take long before politicians of dem mindset wireworked the vote to any free man, which led right to where we are today. No skin in the game, vote yourself access to the Treasury, even on a small scale.

Don’t misunderstand, I want as many as possible to vote, just require some intelligence and proving self responsibility. At the same time take care of any who can not take care of themselves, with the stipulation that welfare removes the right to vote during and some logical grace-period afterward.


69 posted on 12/15/2014 2:41:42 PM PST by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

property ownership is a pretty good proxy for “skin in the game”, “stability”, “established citizenship”, and even a proxy of intelligence and character.


70 posted on 12/15/2014 2:58:55 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Progressives always end up seeing the need to kill a lot of people in order to build utopia.

This is a problem not unique to 'progressives'. It is endemic to *all* 'utopia' builders, whatever their stripe. They all, no matter what their particular cause, share the fantasy that they can build something lasting and good using the blood and bones of those who disagree with their 'vision' as a foundation.

The Good Lord spare me from such, whatever label they choose to go by, for they are the embodiment of one of Einstein's definition of insanity: "Doing the same thing repeatedly, in the exact same manner, and expecting the results to be different."

the infowarrior

71 posted on 12/15/2014 5:09:07 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Sure you can; if the cities of South Vietnam and Cambodia are held by educated elites, and the farmland is controlled by peasants, who will win?

The ones who are eating.


72 posted on 12/16/2014 4:26:56 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

The South was starving by the end of the Civil War due to the disruptions in farming; they couldn’t eat what wasn’t sown/harvested. The blockade prevented them from importing sufficient food from elsewhere.


73 posted on 12/16/2014 4:28:03 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t be silly...liberals don’t want to split the country...they want to rule the nation like in the “Hunger Games”


74 posted on 12/16/2014 4:30:33 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

There was plenty of food being grown in most of the South. As can be seen by Sherman’s march through Georgian and the Carolinas, with most of 100,000 men sustained by the country they marched through.

Southern cities and armies had major food problems, but that was due mainly to collapse of railroads and other transport. There were also serious problems caused by a lack of salt, but again that was mostly a transport issue, and caused difficulty in preserving food, not producing it.

The South never made the slightest attempt to import bulk products like food, for fairly obvious reasons. Even if they had been able to, they wouldn’t have been able to get it to where it was needed.


75 posted on 12/16/2014 4:37:39 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?
dept of agriculture bennies to farmers are support for rural areas when in fact these are to lower food prices

Farm welfare payments are a real rat's nest. But many if not most of them are intended to keep crop prices artificially high, not bring them down. Then low-income city (and country) dwellers get food stamps so they can buy the artificially high-priced food.

76 posted on 12/16/2014 4:39:52 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The main problem of supply for the Confederate Army wasn't availability of stock it was a very corrupt quartermaster corp combined with poor transportation. The officers in the supply chain were second stringers that were pretty much ignored. Only the CSA ammunition supply was up to par with the union because civilians didn't need or buy ammo.

The Union took a more serious approach to supply and ran a less corrupt first rate quartermaster corp that was scrutinized/inspected regularly by the high ranking officers and got attention. Actually McClellan was a master logistician if not a mediocre field commander.

77 posted on 12/16/2014 4:46:54 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Don’t know about the corruption of CSA quartermasters. But the CSA’s biggest supply problems were related to transport and lack of money with which to buy food, leading to “requisition” of supplies from farmers that wasn’t all that different from what Sherman did when marching through.

The CSA had no money and its troops needed to eat. The most honest and efficient quartermaster in the world can’t help that situation much. Especially when its transport system was much inferior to that of the Union before the War, and progressively fell apart as it progressed.


78 posted on 12/16/2014 4:59:40 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

You have your view I have mine. The war was very popular in the South up to the fall of Atlanta. The CSA govt paid a lot for supplies. Nobody stole anything.


79 posted on 12/16/2014 5:04:28 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This wonderful essay describes a great idea that would have worked in the 1860s. But only without Lincoln. As president Lincoln was certainly a great poet-politician, but by far our worst president who decided that chaining the unwilling together was worth 600,000 lives and the destruction of the South’s economy ( which persists). We needed more persistent diplomacy.

The problem is that from now on we have to do what China wants us to do, because they already own us. In addition they have bought off our elites who are the middle-men earning temporary windfall profit from millions of slave laborers in China’s laogai. (The laogai are a system of slave labor camps, many of whose inmates are political dissidents or genuine Christians living in unbelievably inhuman conditions. )

Our middle-men turncoats have slandered us in our youth culture/media until most of our younger citizens now have no religion, no intact families, and no genuine allegiances.

By this essay’s date of 2019 China may have called in our debts to them. China has too many people and too few resources. They are aggressive and racist and were our capable enemies in Korea(draw) and Vietnam (defeated us).

What China did to Tibet they will do to us, that is, replace the people with Han Chinese and take over the land and resources. China even rerouted a major Tibetan river into China desiccating a large area of Tibet.
In 2029, if you are lucky, you may be alive but exist in a Laogai camp doing deep mining in Kentucky,etc.


80 posted on 12/16/2014 6:51:41 AM PST by De La Marche (This is a shallow and addled analysis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson