Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

But funding the development of nuclear weapons, or power, is a military/political decision only slightly affected by economics.
If in their interests, another country can just give it to them for nothing even .

SA simply hasn’t any economic reason to reduce it’s production as there will be no resulting rise in price since demand is so low and supply so plentiful. Any geopolitical benefits are vague and doubtful.
Iran, like some other countries, hasn’t any leeway in it’s oil production, it always needs the maximum and spends every penny- on something besides improving it’s production facilities LOL!.


16 posted on 12/19/2014 11:52:36 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
But funding the development of nuclear weapons, or power, is a military/political decision only slightly affected by economics.

I disagree, when revenues are half of what are needed. It is a time of desperation for nations like Iran and Venezuela, because their spending has been really out of control.

If in their interests, another country can just give it to them for nothing even .

I believe Russia had that attitude, before they got in such financial problems themselves. Which other nuclear power do you think would fund that today?

17 posted on 12/19/2014 11:56:02 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson