Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!
Not to muddy the issue, but I always believed that the bombs saved millions of lives, both American and Japanese.

If we had invaded Japan, we would have to have killed just about every man, woman, and child in the country. They were preparing to fight using bamboo spears. And our casualties would have been in the hundreds of thousands. Counter-intuitive as it sounds, the bombs saved millions of lives.

59 posted on 12/27/2014 8:24:32 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Rummyfan

One estimate I saw years ago stated that a conventional invasion of Japan would have extended the war through at least 1946 and would have cost 5 - 6 million Japanese lives and one million additional American casualties.

The A-bombs, as you said, saved millions of lives.


74 posted on 12/27/2014 9:18:13 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Everytime the cash register rings in a gun store, a Founding Father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

In 2005, I spoke to the gentleman who was a ground crew chief for my late dad’s England-based B-17 bomb group base. He told me two interesting things: 1) That Stalin stopped working on the bomb after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and 2) Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved close to a million Allied lives. I believe him.


168 posted on 12/28/2014 7:46:20 PM PST by bootless ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth."~RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson