Posted on 12/29/2014 4:54:10 AM PST by WhiskeyX
I’m sorry, was I the one who resigned from congress before my term was up?
During the clinton Administration, the clintonites found new, evil uses for NATO, which should have been abolished. America and its allies bombed Serbia in order to back savage muslim drug dealers and organ traffickers. They murdered 2000 civilians in the process. And by expanding NATO, the sowed the seeds for obama’s Cold War II.
Russia retaliated for NATO expansion, for Kosovo and for the clinton-Yeltsin emasculation of their country by elevating Vladimir Putin to the Presidency, so that they cold fight back against the clintonites and their successors.
clinton’s “favorable” fiscal policy was the work of one Newt Gingrich, whom few want to give credit for anything. And the increasing corporate productivity was made possible by finally leaning to use the technology that had been developed in the “bad old” 1980s—the Reagan era.
Meanwhile, millions of Americans were permanently shut out of the main economy, and had to settle for lesser, less stable jobs than they had been used to. That helped set us up for the economic instability that we are living under today.
We have—in many ways—been living under the clinton Administration from 1993 until the present day. Electing Hillary as President would seal the deal, and result in the demise of our beloved America. Lord have mercy!!!!
The economy was flat and deficits rising until after the November 1994 election when the Republicans took control of Congress.
Similarly, the economy crashed and deficits began to soar after the November 2006 elections when the Democrats took control of Congress.
And let’s not stop there: let’s not fail to credit them with other far-sighted policies that had an effect on American security, such as the wise decision to wall off intelligence between agencies, thus preventing the INS from telling the FBI that known Al Qaeda members were attending American flight schools.
9/11, and its decade+ of war, brought to you by the Clinton Administration.
While all our military top secrets were sold to China in exchange for campaign contributions.
They’re starting this b.s. spin a bit earlier than I thought.
But watch the dumb masses eat it up - especially if the GOP elites go ahead with their plans to force Jeb down our throats. Instead of being a decision on whether continue with Obama’s failed policies, the race will then transform into: “which decade did you like better: the 1990s or the 2000s? BTW.. wanna make history by electing a female?”
The party’s leaders and donors might have money, but it isn’t translating into political shrewdness, that’s for sure.
To say nothing of the Rwandan genocide. The Toon apologized after the fact for not doing anything about it even though he was well informed about what was going on.
That’s what happens when republicans win control of congress starting with the house in 1994. Shutting down the govt also was decisive in bringing the budget under control.
Well done republicans.
Not being satirical.
The only reason there are any fond memories of Clinton are newt Gingrich and the Republican Revolution. I can’t understand anyone not shouting that from the rooftops every time it’s brought up. Remember “The era of Big Government is over”? He crapped his diaper with tax hikes, slowed the economy, and brought in a Republicans landslide. It was smooth sailing except for Monica after that. He was basically a lame duck after 2 years. He agreed with the Republicans and was allowed to keep his pants down and ride in a big jet for 6 years.
The relative peace and economic boom of the 1990's had little to do with Bill Clinton's leadership. In fact, most of his major policy decisions were detrimental to both.
Bill Clinton was the ultimate beneficiary of Ronald Regan's presidency that brought the end to the Carter era depressed economy and Stagflation. His policies also brought about the fall and demise of the USSR, the end to the Cold War and the freedom of millions of Eastern Europeans after 50 years behind the Iron Curtain.
In that post cold war era the political talk centered around the impact and potential benefits of the budgetary "Peace Dividend" the US would see as a result of reduced confrontations and tensions, etc.
But, true to form, Bill Clinton, squandered the opportunity.
Instead of placing the interests of the nation first and foremost he spent his time in office pursuing his (and Hillary's) socialist agenda, fomenting racial divisiveness, stomping on critics and opponents, enriching himself and his friends, and satisfying his own sexual appetites.
In many ways Bill (and Hillary) Clinton laid the groundwork for the kind of vindictive, scorched-earth democrat party we have today.
And, as the Reagan policies were the building blocks for the good times enjoyed during the Bush 41 and Bill Clinton years, the weakness and poor decisions of the Clinton administration were the building blocks of the sinking economy, foreign entanglements and reduced national security that lead to the disaterous attacks on the USA on September 11, 2001.
Yeah? So how'd that work out?
Racial discrimination was such an important issue to him he waited until he was on his way out the door to mention it. Class act.
Yeah? Pray tell. How'd he do that?
Gutted the military after Reagan collapsed the Soviet Union.
Attacked Serbia which had done nothing to us and aided jihadis in taking over 2 European countries.
Committed treason by selling our missile guidance technology and nuke weapons technology to China.
Bunghole Billy just happened to be in orifice when the Internet boom was in force. He had absolutely nothing to do with that. But the libidiots give him credit for it, just like O$hithead gets credit for killing Bin Laden.
thanks to the continuation of the Reagan economy
For those who may have forgotten what kind of a President Bill Clinton was:
1) Clinton’s own words show his often expressed innate hostility to, and utter contempt for, the core principles of the American founding:
``If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government’s ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.’’ -- President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993
``The purpose of government is to reign in the rights of the people’’ –- Bill Clinton during an interview on MTV in 1993
``We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…that we forget about reality.’’ -- President Bill Clinton, quoted in USA Today, March 11, 1993, Page 2A, ``NRA change: `Omnipotent to powerful’’’ by Debbie Howlett
“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly… that they would work for the common good, as well as for the individual welfare… However, now there’s a lot of irresponsibility. And so a lot of people say there’s too much freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it.” – Bill Clinton, April 19, 1995
2) Clinton inevitably pursued his own political advantage at the expense of American interests and national security. Here is just one of many possible examples:
It is well documented that Clinton and the Democrats took illegal campaign money from groups and individuals tied directly to the Chinese People’s Republican Army. It is therefore not surprising that In January 1998 Clinton went against the advice of then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Pentagon experts by lifting long-standing restrictions against the export of American satellites to China for launch on Chinese rockets. Not only did he move control over such decisions from the more security-focused State Department to the Commerce Department, but he intervened in a Justice Department investigation of Loral Space & Communications, retroactively enabling Loral to sell critical missile technology to the Chinese. Interestingly enough, Clinton’s decision was made at the request of Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz, whose earlier $1.3 million campaign donation made him the single biggest contributor to the Democratic election effort.
The result, as stated eloquently by syndicated columnist Linda Bowles, was that “the Democrats got money from satellite companies and from Chinese communists; China got supercomputors, advanced production equipment and missile technology; Loral got its satellites launched at bargain basement prices . . . and the transfer of sensitive missile technology gave China [for the first time] the capability of depositing bombs on American cities.” Incidentally, Loral ultimately failed to benefit from this permanent injury to America’s security interests: in July 2003, the company filed for bankruptcy protection, and in order to raise cash was forced to sell its most profitable business – a fleet of communications satellites orbiting over North America.
3) On two occasions, Clinton used military action for the specific purpose of distracting the American public from the fallout of the Lewinsky affair:
• On August 20, three days after Clinton finally admitted publicly to the Lewinsky affair, the news media was poised to focus on that day’s grand jury testimony by Monica Lewinsky. That same morning, Clinton personally went on national television to gravely announce his bombing of a Sudanese “chemical weapons factory,” and a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. It was the first time most Americans ever heard the name of Osama bin Laden. The factory bombing in Sudan killed an innocent night watchman, but accomplished little else. It later was proven that the plant was making badly needed pharmaceuticals for people in that poverty-stricken part of the world, but no chemical weapons.
Several months later, the U.S. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, part of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, stated: "...the evidence indicates that the facility had no role whatsoever in chemical weapons development." Kroll Associates, one of the world's most reputable investigative firms, also confirmed that there was no link in any way between the plant and any terrorist organization. As for the Afghanistan bombing, it failed to do any damage at all to bin Laden or his organization. Clinton’s action was accurately characterized by George W. Bush when he said right after 9-11: "When I take action, I’m not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt.
Clinton’s pointless and murderous military actions did not make Americans safer that day, although they did destroy an innocent life, and for all the good they did certainly could have been delayed in any case. But they did succeed in diverting media attention from Lewinsky’s grand jury testimony for a 24-hour news cycle, which was the main point. So I guess, they weren’t a total loss.
•On December 16, 1998, on the eve of the scheduled House vote on his impeachment, Bill Clinton launched a surprise bombing attack on Baghdad. As justification for this exploit, he cited the urgent threat that Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction posed to America, and the need for immediate action. Almost immediately, the House Democrats held a caucus and emerged calling for a delay in the impeachment proceedings. House minority leader Dick Gephardt made a statement: "We obviously should pass a resolution by saying that we stand behind the troops. I would hope that we do not take up impeachment until the hostilities have completely ended."
Conveniently, a delay so near the end of the House term would have caused the vote to be taken up in the next session – when the newly elected House membership would be seated with more Democratic representation, thereby improving Clinton’s chances of dodging impeachment.
The Republicans did, in fact, agree to delay the hearings, but only for a day or two. Amazingly, Clinton ended the bombing raid after only 70 hours -- once it became clear that in spite of the brief delay, the vote would still be held in the current session.
Once the bombing stopped, Clinton touted the effectiveness and importance of the mission. As reported by ABC News : “We have inflicted significant damage on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programs, on the command structures that direct and protect that capability, and on his military and security infrastructure,” he said. Defense secretary William Cohen echoed the point: “We estimate that Saddam's missile program has been set back by at least a year.”
Whether or not one buys Clinton’s assessment of that mission, it is difficult to believe that its timing was so critical that it required commencement virtually at the moment the House was scheduled to vote on the impeachment. I think the most reasonable conclusion is that Clinton cynically deployed US military assets and placed military personnel in harm’s way for purely political reasons.
4) Clinton’s reckless sexual behavior was a threat to American national security:
Clinton and his supporters have been very effective in persuading large numbers of Americans that the Lewinsky scandal was “only about sex.” But I see a bigger issue here, because Clinton is on record as saying that he would have done anything to keep knowledge of the Lewinsky affair from becoming public.
To me, that statement raises a very serious question: What if, instead of sending her recorded Lewinsky conversations to Ken Starr, Linda Tripp had instead secretly offered them for sale, say, to the Chinese government? Or to the Russians? Or even to agents of Saddam?
What kind of blackmail leverage would those tapes have provided to a foreign government in dealing with America on sensitive trade, security or military issues? One of the few things Clinton ever said that I believe is that he would have done anything to keep the Lewinsky affair secret. Given his demonstrated track record of selling out American interests for personal or political gain (and there are more examples that I could have cited here), how far would he have gone in compromising America’s real interests in order to protect his own neck when threatened with blackmail?
Pretty far, I believe. Equally distressing is the prospect Clinton might, in fact, have succumbed to foreign black mail on other occasions in order to hide different sexual episodes that ultimately did not become public. There is no way to know, of course, but I prefer presidents for whom such a scenario is not a plausible possibility.
And don’t even get me started on the war crime in Kosovo.
WAR IN KOSOVO
During Bill Clinton’s 1999 NATO-led war in Kosovo – which according to some estimates cost as much as $75 billion – we bombed Belgrade for 78 days, killed almost 3,000 civilians, and shredded the civilian infrastructure (including every bridge across the Danube.)
We devastated the environment, bombed the Chinese embassy, came very close to engaging in armed combat against Russian forces, and in general, pursued a horrific and inhumane strategy to rain misery on the civilian population of Belgrade in order to pressure Milosevic into surrendering.
Why did we do all that? The US did not even have an arguable interest in the Balkans, and no one ever tried to claim that Serbia represented any kind of threat to our nation or our interests.
But for months the Clinton administration had told us that Milosevic was waging a vicious genocide against Albanian Muslims, and needed to be stopped. The New York Times called it a “humanitarian war.” In March 1999 – the same month that the bombing started – Clinton’s State Department publicly suggested that as many as 500,000 Albanian Kosovars had been murdered by Milosevic’s regime. In May of that year, as the bombing campaign was drawing to a close, Secretary of Defense William Cohen lowered that estimate 100,000.
Five years after the bombing, after all the forensic investigations had been completed, the prosecutors at Milosevic’s “War Crimes” trial in the Hague were barely been able to document a questionable figure of perhaps 5,000 “bodies and body parts.” During the war, the American people were told that Kosovo was full of mass graves filled with the bodies of murdered Albanian Muslims. But none were ever found.
BILL CLINTON ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
During the election cycle of 1992, George H.W. Bush lost his job after Bill Clinton hammered him relentlessly for having caused the “worst economy of the last 50 years.”
In fact, as CNN’s Brooke Jackson has reported: “Three days before Christmas 1992, the National Bureau of Economic Research finally issued its official proclamation that the recession had ended 21 months earlier. What became the longest boom in U.S. history actually began nearly two years before Clinton took office.” See (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/31/jackson.recession.primer.otsc/).
By the same token, Clinton is generally perceived as having a stellar economic record during his own presidency, in spite of the fact that the economy was already starting to decline during the last year of his term after the stock market crashed in March 2000.
According to a report by MSNBC: “The longest economic expansion in U.S. history faltered so much in the summer of 2000 that business output actually contracted for one quarter, the government said Wednesday in releasing a comprehensive revision of the gross domestic product. Based on new data, the Commerce Department said that the GDP — the country’s total output of goods and services — shrank by 0.5 percent at an annual rate in the July-September quarter of 2000.” See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3676690/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/gdp-figures-revised-downward/.
The economy was entirely because of Newt and the Congress under Republican control with a direct and actionable plan, Clinton just stayed out of the way and went along for the ride,
I blame Clinton for allowing terrorism to come to our shores, it was both by his actions and inaction’s that brought it here,
Clinton sent James Carville to Israel in the 1990s to get Ehud Barak elected, this was done for no other reason than to install a puppet to sign an agreement dividing up the land with Yasser Arafat.
Using Ehud Barak, Clinton tried to give the Palestinians everything they wanted, but Arafat rejected it because it wasn’t 100% of his demands.
I suspected it would fail at the time and it did. I didn’t believe it was time then for that to happen yet,
I said at the time, these overt actions by Clinton would bring bad things upon this nation, and I believe it has in the form of terrorism,
“And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.” Zechariah 12:3
“For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.” 1 Thessalonians 5:3
Because he interfered directly for the ultimate goal of electing those that will willingly surrender Israels rights and sovereignty away from what God restored in 1948 and 1967.
I believe that when this division does finally occur (of Jerusalem or Judea or both) this is when the end comes. I don’t know how soon after, only that it will follow.
“I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.” Joel 3:2
“And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; “ Isaiah 28:18
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.