New York Times blasts NYPD’s ‘snarling sense of victimhood’

Hotair ^ | 12/30/2014 | NOAH ROTHMAN

[Colonel_Flagg]

Let’s get Times reporters writing parking tickets, then. Simple solution.

[hinckley buzzard]

Hot Air is rightly named. Talk is so f*ing cheap when your own ass is not on the line. These pukes are no better than the Slimes.

[rrrod]

wouldnt it be funny if all the employees of the NY Times had their home addresses/phone numbers published!?! What a hoot!

[Mears]

“Yeah, well, sitting in your patrol car eating your lunch and then getting blasted into kingdom come might make you a trace self-pitying. What arseholes!”

—

I just started this thread but your #2 post says it all.

No need for me to go any further.

:-)

.

[SaraJohnson]

Leftists have cops in a headlock. Right where they want them. Right where I knew this police abuse thing was headed before the Left acted.

[GOPJ]

Well, The New York Times has just about had it with the NYPD’s “snarling sense of victimhood” – a sense they earned when de Blasio emerged hours after the grand jury’s decision, blamed it on racial antipathy despite the presence of numerous African-American members on that panel, and confessed that he had taught his own biracial son to fear the police force he commands.

The New York Times thinks the only people with a right to 'victimhood' are liberal 'pets'... all their favorite pet groups. Nicest thing about the police pulling back some is a few of those groups that have made a caraar about of being victims might ACTUALLY BE victims for once...

The police should stay safe until the New York Times boys beg them to go back to full policing... on their knees... same with hiz honor.

[GOPJ]

Well, The New York Times has just about had it with the NYPD’s “snarling sense of victimhood” – a sense they earned when de Blasio emerged hours after the grand jury’s decision, blamed it on racial antipathy despite the presence of numerous African-American members on that panel, and confessed that he had taught his own biracial son to fear the police force he commands.

The New York Times thinks the only people with a right to 'victimhood' are liberal 'pets'... all their favorite pet groups. Nicest thing about the police pulling back some is a few of those groups that have made a career about of being victims might ACTUALLY BE victims for once...

The police should stay safe until the New York Times boys beg them to go back to full policing... on their knees... same with hiz honor.

[depressed in 06]

Why ObOzO and the regime promote a young punk and a street hustler to justify mob rule is a mystery? They seem to go back to “fast and furious” tactics to justify a national Gestapo. Like killing a border agent with arms transferred to Mexican drug gangs to justify Second Amendment retrenchment, this is destined to fail since the victims are less than sympathetic.

The purpose of the police is to enforce the law. To not back the police in this pursuit is to relegate the rule of law to mob rule. If they don’t like the law, change the law, don’t ignore it or worse, delegate it to the mob.

[ViLaLuz]

Pure psychological projection from diblasio and his ilk.

[Personal Responsibility]

Only those anointed by the NY Times are allowed to be victims.

[timestax]

[SunkenCiv]

Bill de Blasio aides asked political allies to publicly slam NYPD officers for turning their backs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3242526/posts

[SunkenCiv]

"Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel." -- Mark Twain

Never pick a fight with people on the other end of the 9-1-1 line.