[frog in a pot]

The names you propose sound good to us. However, my concern is they might cause an unnecessary knee-jerk, opposite reaction of many middle-of-the-road voters who spend 5-10 minutes out of each multi-year voting cycle thinking about it.

For instance, think of the reaction “Tea Party” causes with many barely informed or easily influenced voters, even though they would likely agree with its broad principles after a careful examination.

Not an expert here, but perhaps something such as the

“Republican Action Party”

That is perhaps more enticing as it presents an immediate contrast to rino’s by offering what most desired; and the acronym is not so bad either.

[Scooter100]

re: Republican Action Party. "....and the acronym is not so bad either."

Oh, you mean RAP? The most racist, cop-murdering, female bashing music on the planet? Yeah, that's a nice connection to make. Sure is a good idea you got there.

Hey, dig the wax out of your ears, why dontcha.

[Mamzelle]

Nope. See, this is the problem. Everybody wants to name the child, and you end up with ten names. "Action" sounds like a Prog org. Action for America? Remember. It's also why "Constitution" won't work. The idea--the clear delineation of Republican Establishment and Republican Conservatives.

Observe how hard it is for SC to get rid of Lindsey Graham. They confuse the voters.

It's my opinion that the Democrat love affair with illegal aliens from Central America will lead inevitable to several parties in the US--because these aliens come from a multi-party tradition. Once that happens, "La Raza Revolutionary Party"--we will cease to be a 2-party nation. I'm thinking that might really be a good thing.