Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley

Yes. I’ve been saying this on the threads about it since the speech.

It is a fine speech.

She has given better. It was a bit rushed at times.

But those are trivial issues I wouldn’t think twice about if it weren’t for the hysteria and derangement.

She began with the intro part, the first 20% or quarter of it talking about all the things she had done in Iowa in the past. Because it was a speech to and for Iowans.

That lead to her talking how from Iowa they drove up to a little town called Dixon Illinois, not too far away. Birthplace of Ronald Reagan.

Right there she set the parameters of where she was coming from. A politician/citizen respectful of, and in the mold of, Ronald Reagan.

I also noticed she did not have any uhs...and ums...and uh, uh, um...like a certain politician whose ticket beat hers in 2008.


6 posted on 02/04/2015 8:43:14 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan
I also noticed she did not have any uhs...and ums...and uh, uh, um...like a certain politician whose ticket beat hers in 2008.

I noticed that too, about Obama. When his teleprompter malfunctions all you hear is "uh, uh, uh,..." reminding me of a scared monkey. Lots of video clips abound of Obama stuttering when a speech isn't delivered to his face by teleprompter. Sarah did just fine with her speech. What her detractors don't like is the pitch of her voice and her exuberance delivering a speech, which is just fine because the content is meaningful and real.

10 posted on 02/04/2015 12:01:55 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson