Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Black Agnes

Digging back thru history, it has wiped out large fractions of populations.


45 posted on 02/06/2015 7:54:30 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

So did childbirth.

1963 was still a statistically safe time to have a baby. Antibiotics, sterile surgical suites and an understanding of prenatal care were all important.

And the 1/3 was for all cause mortality. Prior to antibiotics a simple scratch could kill. Infected teeth killed. Hangnails could kill.

None of which negates the statistic that, in 1963, the odds of dying from measles was about 1.5/100,000. Post measles infections were controlled with antibiotics and as it turns out, vitamin A status is very important when you have measles. If you’re deficient in vitamin A your trip will be a bumpy one in comparison to your sibling who ate their carrots like a good boy.

So to imply that death rate from measles today would be 1/3 is hyperbole of the tallest order. Even in the 1910’s the death rate only approached 15/100,000.

Mash here: (this one has most childhood disease death rates back to 1900)

http://images2.cafemomstatic.com/images/user/gallery/post_179439_1251302392_med.jpg?imageId=16319933


46 posted on 02/06/2015 8:06:43 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson