Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thinks Americans Are Ready for Gay Marriage [Link Only]
Bloomberg [Link Only] | February 12, 2015 | Greg Stohr

Posted on 02/12/2015 6:16:41 AM PST by C19fan

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-12/ginsburg-says-u-s-ready-to-accept-ruling-approving-gay-marriage-i61z6gq2


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistcourt; cultureofcorruption; gay; ginsburg; godsinblackdresses; homofascism; homosexualagenda; judicialactivism; lavendermafia; marriage; ruthbaderginsburg; samesexmarriage; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2015 6:16:41 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-12/ginsburg-says-u-s-ready-to-accept-ruling-approving-gay-marriage-i61z6gq2


2 posted on 02/12/2015 6:16:53 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Rigid & decaying; Ginsberg is the perfect face of the left.


3 posted on 02/12/2015 6:19:44 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; GeronL

We are ready for this old turtle to retire. She won’t have to live in the world of her making.


4 posted on 02/12/2015 6:19:50 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Ruth never asked me if I was ready for this.
Another push,another provocation by the radical left.This will not end well for them.


5 posted on 02/12/2015 6:19:57 AM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It does not matter what she thinks. It matters what the law states. But hey who needs laws when you can do what you want right you communist old hag?


6 posted on 02/12/2015 6:20:37 AM PST by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I hope she waits until after Obama is gone.I’d hate to see Holder on the court.


7 posted on 02/12/2015 6:21:16 AM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimpick

Radically transform the culture. That’s their goal. As it was since 1968.


8 posted on 02/12/2015 6:21:43 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Whore


9 posted on 02/12/2015 6:24:15 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Most gays probably want to win the right more than they actually want to be married. After this battle, they will next fight for the right to have sex with minors.


10 posted on 02/12/2015 6:24:20 AM PST by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

From a legal standpoint what would it matter “if Americans are ready?” The unspoken assumption she appears to hold is that it is the job of the USSC to impose upon us whatever their personal views of morality are so long as they can get away with it.


11 posted on 02/12/2015 6:25:34 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
You nailed it. The next "civil rights" crusade will be for what was formerly known as pedophilia.
12 posted on 02/12/2015 6:26:14 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

yep.


13 posted on 02/12/2015 6:28:29 AM PST by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Then why don’t the American people vote for it? On what does she base this assertion?


14 posted on 02/12/2015 6:29:40 AM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Wow.. she sounds *exactly* like a spokeswoman for one of those homosexual rights organizations, with that whole “the homos are your sons, daughters, brothers, sisters” rhetoric.

Not very neutral of her to say these things while a case is pending, although I have zero faith that she’d recuse herself.


15 posted on 02/12/2015 6:32:10 AM PST by MarkRegal05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The SC wants to rule against the American people, and nullify our votes.
When this threshold is passed it could be applied to any vote for any person
such as deeming any liberal the winner of any election just based on their assumption
that America is ready for a Dictatorship country.

If this is passed there are no more boundaries in our Voting system,
and voting will be meaningless.

16 posted on 02/12/2015 6:32:41 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkRegal05

Expect a wholesale agenda full of (Americans are ready) laws.


17 posted on 02/12/2015 6:34:12 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Eat your Jello and go back to sleep Ruthie.


18 posted on 02/12/2015 6:35:05 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Look! Snowflakes! We're all gonna die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Yeah. That's why every state where Americans have been asked to vote on the matter has voted no.

With as close as this fossil is to meeting her maker you'd think she'd be a little more circumspect in her pronouncements. Whatever circumspect means.

Maybe she doesn't know what happens to those who lead others astray. Hopefully there's someone who cares enough about her to tell her while she still has time to, oh, I don't know, repent.

19 posted on 02/12/2015 6:36:16 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I have no doubt, although I think we’ll see these policies via judicial fiat more than via actual legislation. The Democrat Party hasn’t won many elections, so they’re relying on their judicial nominees to do some of their most egregious dirty work.

Reid and Obama knew that they had a limited window in which to work, which is why they rammed through as many judges as they could in the time they had, even going so far as to rig the confirmation process in the Senate by neutering the filibuster. Now, a full 1/3rd of the federal judiciary is Obama-appointed, so we’ll be paying for his re-election for decades.

The Dems stated their goals and went after them. I wish the GOP had the same killer instinct.. instead of flinching at its own shadow.


20 posted on 02/12/2015 6:41:35 AM PST by MarkRegal05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson