To: Kaslin
Of course it would have to be illegal to drive under the influence, fly under the influence, try a case under the influence, be in a medical professional’s arena under the influence, operate any type of common carrier under the influence, in any school under the influence, in a day care or nursing home under the influence, operate large equipment under the influence, be in a manufacturing plant under the influence, carry an LEO badge under the influence. But clearly, if you are already a lay about, it should be legal.
2 posted on
02/22/2015 6:20:40 AM PST by
yldstrk
To: yldstrk
But all that is true for alcohol, too. And we seem to have a handle on that.
Question: Why did it take a constitutional amendment to bring about prohibition of alcohol but mere legislation to outlaw marihuana?
3 posted on
02/22/2015 6:51:14 AM PST by
Procyon
(Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
To: yldstrk
Of course it would have to be illegal to drive under the influence, fly under the influence, try a case under the influence, be in a medical professionals arena under the influence, operate any type of common carrier under the influence, in any school under the influence, in a day care or nursing home under the influence, operate large equipment under the influence, be in a manufacturing plant under the influence, carry an LEO badge under the influence.It already is. Colorado is proving the perceived dangers exist only in the closed minds of drug prohibitionists. Legal weed chased the cartels out of our state, and put the underground dealers out of business.
4 posted on
02/22/2015 7:11:27 AM PST by
SpeakerToAnimals
(I hope to earn a name in battle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson