Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kemp: Shale Producers Postpone Oil Well Completions
Reuters via Rig Zone ^ | February 20, 2015 | John Kemp

Posted on 02/22/2015 5:10:17 PM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: thackney

this means that they can pretty quickly ramp up production once prices improve.


21 posted on 02/22/2015 9:47:34 PM PST by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Government acknowledged inflation has been slowing. Real inflation's rise has been slowed. The increase in the rate has slowed but the level of inflation is still rising albeit more slowly. The general price rise has a long way to go but won't be the smooth rise of the past. So long as the stock market continues to rise the prices on the street will continue to rise more slowly but still rather faster than the official half percent. When the stock market crashes general prices will commence to rise rapidly. Most of the new created money went into the stock market. That is why it keeps going up even as the economy languishes. The money went to the banks who couldn't lend it profitably so it got diverted into the Market.
Emotionally I watch NYSE just climb and climb and I want it to fall because people think we must be economically in good shape because of the continual rise. In my head though, I know that it must keep rising if my dollars are to continue to be useful.
22 posted on 02/23/2015 5:33:05 AM PST by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Dismantling the big unions is a plus for the economy. Meanwhile they and their strikes provide those signs of continuing inflation. I repeat, and Sowell and von Mises and Friedman all agree, that in an inflation wages are the prices that rises last. Throughout the 90s there was effectively a gentle deflation- prices continually declined as the production of goods and services rose at a higher rate than the money supply. There were not strikes beyond one or two at companies that themselves were in trouble. Wages did not increase much in nominal terms but earners were not stressed. Their money seemed to go a bit farther over time. They did not strike.


23 posted on 02/23/2015 5:45:40 AM PST by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

You only hold a lease with production, not an incomplete well.


24 posted on 02/23/2015 5:53:15 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I always appreciate your fact filled energy posts. Thanks !


25 posted on 02/23/2015 9:27:52 AM PST by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt; thackney
I always appreciate your fact filled energy posts. Thanks !
Second.

26 posted on 02/23/2015 3:55:07 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Striking workers ..."enemies domestic"
27 posted on 02/23/2015 4:05:53 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation; thackney
In my view fracking can shut down due to low prices, and it can start right up again when prices go up. It’s a technology that is well proven, and will be employed whenever the financials are adequate.
That’s fine as far as it goes - but it entails the cost of training up new workers to replace those who move on because they can’t just get in a can and wait for the industry to pop the lid off again when prices are right. Just naturally raises costs. There are good counter arguments, but I’m still not convinced that we shouldn’t impose a protective tariff on oil. Not a huge one, of course - just enough to put a thumb on the scales in favor of domestic production. Thereby cushioning the notorious swings the fuel market is subject to. That might also, tangentially, improve the market for NG. But thackney points out that some of our refining capacity is best suited for imported oil. Clearly that would place a hardship on people who don’t deserve it.

28 posted on 02/23/2015 5:11:49 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I’m still not convinced that we shouldn’t impose a protective tariff on oil.

- - -

I’m 100% convinced we should not. Do not have the feds pick winners and losers in private industry. We need our refineries and petrochemical industries just as much.


29 posted on 02/23/2015 7:02:58 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson