[Lou L]

I'm almost certain that this is to gain an additional governmental toe hold in 401(k) accounts, and that there will be additional "provisions" to make this proposal even more nefarious. The fact that it singles out 401(k) "protections" should be enough to scare anyone with a 401(k) plan away from it.

We don't need your protection, Obama.

[NativeSon]

and the majority of Zero's mindless supporters do not have 401(k)'s - the "rich people" have those

if this was played right, we could pit the gimmiedats against the educated libs

[Buckeye McFrog]

Google “Theresa Ghilarducci” and the game will become clear.

[VanShuyten]

“I’m almost certain that this is to gain an additional governmental toe hold in 401(k) accounts...”

TIAA-CFEF just increased my IRA fees by 40%, while decreasing my State of Maryland 401 fees by 50%.

Buying influence or succumbing to government pressure? Individuals have no pull, but governments do. Managing an individual account must be cheaper than managing an account for an individual through a government agency with a lot of regulations on it.

[CSM]

I fear you are correct and many a fool will fall for it.

Again.