DHS declares ‘right-wing sovereign citizens’ top U.S. terror threat

Personal Liberty ^ | 2/24/2015 | Sam Rolley

[HomerBohn]

It’s about time to see what this DHS have morphed into. We’ve seen quite enough of the groping of passengers in the airport screening lines while leering muslims slip on through.

[Liz]

[txrefugee]

I’m sure the chancellor of the University of Wisconsin-Madison thinks Gov. Scott Walker is a major threat to her, too. He makes less than $200,000 as governor of the state, while she makes almost $500,000 to head the university. So his plan to cut back the state subsidy for her outrageous salary certainly is a threat to her place at the taxpayer-funded trough.

[certrtwngnut]

WOW! 24 Instances in a country of 315 million. My calculator does not compute in percentages that small.

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[a fool in paradise]

DHS are questioning right-wingers’ “patriotism”.

FU BOBO
FU Dana Millbrook

[HomerBohn]

I’m becoming more convinced, in spite of what is regurgitated from the MSM, that Scott Walker may indeed be the real deal come next year.

That is, unless Americans with low attention spans decide that what we need is Act III of the Bush saga.

[a fool in paradise]

DHS will never go away.

Part of their area of concern is protection of Hollywood’s copyrights and the NFL’s trademarks.

this nation is Eff’ed.

[McGruff]

[HMS Surprise]

If you don’t understand what a sovereign citizen is, don’t talk about it.

[Arlis]

The very name “Department of Homeland Security” sounds like something from Nazi Germany, Communist USSR or China.........

And, as in those nations, will actually be used solely to suppress the freedoms of citizen’s and to arrest them with false charges.......

[FlingWingFlyer]

I agree. As an American, even the name Department of HOMELAND Security gives me the creeps.

[indthkr]

“right-wing sovereign citizen extremists”

Are those DHS codewords for conservative constitutionalists? Or anybody else who believes in the rule of law and due process, as set forth in those founding documents?

[Seattle Conservative]

“The DHS document classifies sovereign citizens as people who feel they have “unfettered authority to travel ‘on the land’” and who are likely to reject “the authority of the government, law enforcement, and the courts.” “

Sounds like illegals and Obummer to me.

[saleman]

“I wonder what a “routine law enforcement encounter at the suspect’s home” means? Unannounced SWAT teams busting in, shooting dogs and scaring kids because they sell raw milk or maybe they just got the wrong address? That’s routine?”

Law enforcement really dislikes persons who would shoot back.

[rhubarbk]

"I’m becoming more convinced, in spite of what is regurgitated from the MSM, that Scott Walker may indeed be the real deal come next year. That is, unless Americans with low attention spans decide that what we need is Act III of the Bush saga."

I hope that you are spot on. We don't want or need Act III.

[Yardstick]

I wonder if the DHS report acknowledges that huge difference.

[cripplecreek]

I don’t think it is ‘anarchist’ as much as it is a fervent desire to see the US Constitution observed and not ignored.

That may be true of some, but its certainly not true of all. We have a few locally who are out to lunch. Lately they've been complaining that our pseudo theological government won't allow mail delivery on Sunday. A few years back they had a big fight with the township over the fact that one home couldn't have multiple addresses when they had multiple access drives to it. That argument ended when he had a modular home put on a part of his property in the next county and he became their problem. Last I heard he had a list of reasons why that county and township had no authority over him with one of those reasons being the size of the flag in the township hall.

[Yardstick]

How did the size of the flag factor in?

[DaveA37]

By the DHS saying does not make it so. The headline is misleading.