“Too Funny”
“Amazingly Naïve”
“Partaking of that newly legalized substance”
You may think it’s a fantasy, but if you actually looked at some of the districts, turnouts, and demographics, and then actually rubbed two brain cells together over it, you’d see it.
I’m not talking about the dependent voters, I’m talking about the ~5-15% in any given area that tack either way, and also a certain quantity of the sit-outs.
You still have yet to come up with anything remotely resembling a rebuttal other than GOPe type hyperbole.
I came up with an actual do-able example. Of all the house seats the Republicans picked up in the last cycle, they sure as hell didn’t get them all by suddenly having a few million couch sitting registered R’s up and decide they were going to vote this time.
Out of 435 seats, 24-36 isn’t much. Besides, who needs the 3rd party to be big? I just want those seats to provide sand that seizes the gears of government up. If they all sat their and picked their noses for the whole session, we’d be 1000X better off.
Hell, how about this option, we just crowd fund paying them to NOT DO ANYTHING. Kind of like idiot/criminal protection money. “Pay up America, or they’ll find something that needs legislating”...
Find the districts in which you can actually get over 50% and go do it. My rebuttal was made clear, but if you choose not to accept it as a rebuttal, that is your choice. 3rd party votes will come mostly from the GOP side and split the votes. Find the key to getting over 50% in 24-36 seats and you will be recognized as the political genius of the early 21st Century. Go become that genius.