Denator, I think you’re a little confused about who is
playing politics with Israel’s security.
Bibi STANDS UP for Israel’s security, while Obama
give it away!
How dire this choice is....... Wimps.
Not only is this an IQ test for the Dhimmis—it’s ALSO
a phys-ed test to see if they have any balls.
Where’s the world’s smallest violin when you need it?
Christians and Jews need to stand up for the United States, or just go on and let the muslims have the nation. Any elected member of the U.S. Congress who boycotts Netanyahu’s speech is siding with the muslims. The voters are watching you, U.S. Congress!
What is UpChuckie going to do?
“Netanyahu was “mistaken to agree to it,” he said. “Speaker Boehner is playing politics with the critical issue of Israel’s security. That’s beyond pardon as far as I’m concerned.”
And Obama’s interfering in Israel’s election is somehow not political?
ABC disinformation:
...he accepted a Republican invitation to speak to Congress...
The Speaker of the House is not a partisan office.
Also note:
Democrat president = American government
GOP president = Republican administration
“Republican invitation”. This is just a bald face lie
The math is very simple to a man of logic. Obama gone in 2 year....Jewish donors and voters are not.
More Democrat transparency, I see. When in doubt, keep it secret.
-PJ
No member of Congress with a conscience or knowledge of history would have a moment’s hesitation deciding which side to take in the current to-attend or not-to-attend brouhaha over a speech that the media has so over-hyped it’s becoming as famous as the Gettysburg Address and it hasn’t even been delivered yet.
On the one hand, there is Israel-hating Barack Obama who wants to help Israel’s worst enemy, Iran, build nuclear weapons that could also be directed at Western governments including the U.S., OR Benjamin Netanyahu whose country continually faces existential threats, not only from prospective Iranian nuclear bombs but also from Hamas terrorists whom Iran supports.
Three weeks after the attack on Pearl Harbor, Winston Churchill gave a speech to a joint session of Congress. If the Speaker of the House at that time had invited Mr. Churchill, whose country had been fighting a war against Japan’s ally Germany, to make a speech BEFORE the Pearl Harbor attack warning the United States about the dangers posed by the German-Japanese Axis of Evil, would the Pearl Harbor attack have been so devastating, so unprepared for? Would it have even taken place at all if Congress had taken Churchill’s warnings to heart?
As far as we know, no British-hating, pro-German or pro-Japanese Congressmen boycotted Winston Churchill’s 1941 speech, as at least thirty Israel-hating pro-Iranian Democratic Congressmen will be boycotting Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech on Tuesday, but if there had been such people, their names would have lived in infamy, as will undoubtedly the names of the thirty anti-Israel, anti-Netanyahu Congressmen of today and their leader Barack Obama.
If the Bolshies were not so afraid Obummer would keep 5% of the skin color voters from the polls, they might grow a pair. 10% stay away they never win another election, with or without illegals.