Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Schedules Argument in Same-Sex Marriage Case For April 28
NBCNews.com ^ | 03/05/2015 | Pete Williams and Erin McClam

Posted on 03/05/2015 7:58:12 AM PST by GIdget2004

The Supreme Court has set April 28 as the date for historic arguments on gay marriage.

The justices agreed in January to definitively answer whether the Constitution allows states to ban same-sex marriage. A ruling is expected by the end of the term in late June.

The court granted cases from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee. It will decide whether states can refuse to issue marriage licenses to gay couples and whether they can refuse to recognize same-sex marriages legally performed elsewhere.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: docket; homosexualagenda; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2015 7:58:12 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

the Supreme Court will affirm the President of Sodom’s wishes for the fate of the United States


2 posted on 03/05/2015 7:59:17 AM PST by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

“the Supreme Court will affirm the President of Sodom’s wishes for the fate of the United States.”

More than likely will kick it back down.


3 posted on 03/05/2015 8:01:12 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Islam is the military wing of the Communist party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The fix is in. Nothing will go the way it is supposed to.


4 posted on 03/05/2015 8:06:04 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Does that mean they’ll allow all the overturned bans to stand?


5 posted on 03/05/2015 8:08:17 AM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The Fix was in from Day 1 going back to Lawrence v. Texas. The Pro-Marriage had a shot with a Constitutional amendment after the Mass SCOT imposed SSM on Mass and the nation erupted with anger. I am not 100% sure what happened but one had cowards like McCain and splits in the Traditionalist movement that resulted in the toothless DOMA that the SCOTUS swatted away.


6 posted on 03/05/2015 8:10:47 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Anyone who doesn’t see that by now, well, I’m not sure what to say about them.


7 posted on 03/05/2015 8:10:55 AM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I would like to remind everybody that our Beloved Republican Majority in Congress could stop this cold TODAY if they wanted to.

article 3, section 2 US Constitution
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

“with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

The supreme Court Shall remain Silent on the issue of Marriage.

Game Over.


8 posted on 03/05/2015 8:14:37 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I was so naive back then. Just a young punk in my 20’s. I thought a constitutional amendment was just a trick like flag burning bans. It seemed so unnecessary at the time. But if you think about: how much more teeth would that amendment have than the 10th amendment?


9 posted on 03/05/2015 8:14:38 AM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Maybe those black robe tyrants can approve of this. You know those sick people want this to be seen as “normal’ then they will prey upon younger children and so on.

ABCFAMILY ‘THE FOSTERS’ Airs Same-Sex Kiss Between Boys...


10 posted on 03/05/2015 8:16:44 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

that the SCOTUS swatted away.

Only because CONGRESS refuse to exert their authority under Article 3, section 2

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make

and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make


11 posted on 03/05/2015 8:17:12 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004; All

I’d like to know what the states are going to argue to defend their prohibitions on gay marriage.


12 posted on 03/05/2015 8:19:06 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

SCOTUS will sell us down the river on this one as well as Obamacare.

Each state has to be prepared to go their own way and use the 10th amendment to fight the gay marriage rulings. Al and TX are doing it. I hope we will do it in GA.


13 posted on 03/05/2015 8:35:26 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

Yep. And not just this case.


14 posted on 03/05/2015 8:40:06 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Did all, or any, of the four states prohibit same-sex marriage by voting of the citizens? I’m puzzled why some were chosen, and some states were not. Is there any difference between the manner that the four states prohibited ss marriage?

Gwjack


15 posted on 03/05/2015 8:50:08 AM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

If the Supreme Court kicks it back down, does the fight then become state by state?


16 posted on 03/05/2015 9:47:05 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Courts have declared laws unconstitutional even when the Congress forbade it.

Change the culture = the law will follow.


17 posted on 03/05/2015 9:53:17 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

“Did all, or any, of the four states prohibit same-sex marriage by voting of the citizens? I’m puzzled why some were chosen, and some states were not. Is there any difference between the manner that the four states prohibited ss marriage?”

The four states included are the four states in the 6th Circuit. That’s the only circuit where the judges ruled that gay marriage is unconstitutional. All the other circuits’ judges have ruled for gay marriage.


18 posted on 03/05/2015 9:56:34 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Sorry - I wrote that wrong. I should have said that the 6th Circuit is the only one to uphold the rights of the states to make their own decisions regarding gay marriage. All other circuits have said that anti-gay marriage laws are unconstitutional.


19 posted on 03/05/2015 9:58:49 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
The supreme Court Shall remain Silent on the issue of Marriage. Game Over.

Then all of the lower court rulings that overturned traditional marriage in many states will stand.

20 posted on 03/05/2015 3:52:37 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson